Published on
00:00
00:00

2Is Ones Destruction the End of all Existence?

Image description

by George Sidney Hurd

 --

There is a lot of confusion within the Church as to the actual meaning of “destruction” as the term is used in the Scriptures. Traditionalists understand it, not as one actually being destroyed or as one’s destruction, since to them the destroying or torment, never ends.

 

Conditionalists believe that it means “annihilation” or the total cessation of one’s existence, much like the secular materialists believe. However, as I hope to demonstrate in this blog, when one looks more closely, they will discover that destruction in Scripture is not a final condition, but rather a necessary process that one must undergo in order to afterwards be restored as part of God’s new creation, just as those who believe in a universal restoration have affirmed since the very first centuries of the Church’s history. [1] This blog is an excerpt from my book, Extermination or Restoration?: A Restorationist’s Response to Annihilationism

 

Defining Destruction

 

The Greek words “apollumi,” “olethros” and “apoleia” are variously translated in the New Testament, depending upon the context. Kittel’s 10 volume work extensively illustrates what the word apollumi can mean within different contexts. He presents four distinct but related meanings found in the New Testament. They can be summarized as follows: 1) “to destroy or kill.” 2) “to lose or suffer loss from.” When apollumi is used in the middle voice it combines meaning 1, “to destroy” with meaning 2, “to lose or suffer loss from” resulting in meaning 3) “to perish” or “to lose one’s life,” and finally, meaning 4) “to be lost.” [i] Vines similarly defines the word olethros as “ruin or destruction,” and apoleia as “loss of well-being, not of being.” [ii]

 

We will be considering several verses where these words appear in their contexts, but none of these words by definition speak of cessation of one’s consciousness or total annihilation. In fact, as we will see, their context often precludes such a notion. A good case example is when the Pharisees plotted with the Herodians how they might destroy (apollumi) Jesus (Mark 3:6). Since the Pharisees believed in the conscious state of the dead and the resurrection both of the just and the unjust, by “destroy” they simply meant to kill His body, removing Him from the land of the living. We have already seen in previous chapters that physical death is not the end of one’s conscious existence. When they crucified Jesus, He did indeed die. However, His body was preserved in the tomb, and His soul was not abandoned in Hades; and on the third day He rose from the dead.

 

Even when apollomi and its cognates are best translated as “destroy” rather than “lose,” they do not primarily refer to the deprivation of life, as “kill” does, even though the subject may indeed die as a result of being destroyed. There are other words that specifically refer to killing someone which better express deprivation of life, such as “slay” (katasphato) (Luke 19:27), “murder” (anaireo) (Luke 22:2), “to kill” (apokteino) (Mt 10:28). But destroying someone does not always mean to kill them. Although the apollumi word group has many shades of meaning ranging from simply being lost to actually killing someone, the basic meaning is to deprive something or someone of its intended purpose. For this reason, Vine’s says of apollumi: “The idea is not extinction but ruin, loss, not of being, but of wellbeing. This is clear from its use, as, e. g., of the marring of wine skins, Luke 5:37; of lost sheep, i.e., lost to the shepherd, (metaphorical of spiritual destitution, Luke 15:4,6, etc.); the lost son, Luke 15:24; of the perishing of food, John 6:27; of gold, 1 Peter 1:7.” [iii]

 

The Savior of the Lost / Destroyed

 

One of the many examples where apollumi clearly doesn’t mean death is the case of the Prodigal son. He spent all his inheritance on riotous living and became destitute. When he returned home to his father, he was received with the father’s embrace and kisses. His father said: “let us eat and be merry; for this my son was dead and is alive again; he was lost (apollumi) and is found” (Luke 15:23-24). The son had lost his way and destroyed himself, yet he did not actually die. In the same way, we may speak of someone as either destroying himself or being destroyed in regard to their reputation, their finances, their health, etc. However, by saying that they are destroyed, we don’t mean that they were killed or ceased to exist.

 

Apollumi is used in reference to that which is lost to its owner but is nevertheless alive. For example, Jesus compared the lost sinners – all of whom He loves – to lost sheep:

 

“What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he loses (apollumi) one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one which is lost (apollumi) until he finds it?  5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing.  6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’ (apollumi)” (Luke 15:4-6)

 

Obviously, Jesus here isn’t saying that the shepherd called a celebration over having found His dead sheep! The parable of the lost sheep is one of a series of five parables which Jesus told in response to the complaint of the Pharisees and scribes that Jesus was befriending sinners:

 

“Then all the tax collectors and the sinners drew near to Him to hear Him. 2 And the Pharisees and scribes complained, saying, ‘This Man receives sinners and eats with them.” (Luke 15:1-2)

 

The parables are: 1) the Lost Sheep, 2) the Lost Coin, 3) the Lost Son or Prodigal, 4) the Unjust Steward and, 5) the Rich Man and Lazarus, all of which are in some way directed against the self-righteous scribes and Pharisees who despised the lost sinners. In the first three parables, Jesus repeats the word apollumi 8 times; in each instance, He is revealing His heart towards the lost sinners whom He came to save, and for that reason was befriending them. Jesus elsewhere stated His mission when He invited Himself into the home of a despised tax collector named Zacchaeus, saying:

 

“for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save (sozo) that which was lost (apollumi).” (Luke 19:10)

 

I believe that both the Traditionalist and the Annihilationists alike need a new, fresh revelation of the heart and mission of God in sending His Son to the world of lost humanity. I believe that Jesus would say to some, just as He said to the “sons of thunder”: “You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy (apollumi) men’s lives but to save (sozo) them” (Luke 9:55-56).

 

By erroneously applying Plato’s concept of eternity to the Scripture’s use of the time-words olam, aion y aionios – understanding them as “eternal” rather than “eonian” or “age during” as the biblical authors obviously understood them, both Traditionalists and Annihilationists fail to see that God’s determinative plan for the ages is to save and not to destroy. [iv] They fail to see that ultimately Christ will indeed fulfill His mission to save all those who are lost. By insisting that He will finally fail to find and save the majority of the lost, they end up presenting Jesus as proportionately saving the one sheep and abandoning the ninety-nine to perpetual perdition (“lostness”).

 

Quite to the contrary, Jesus said that He would leave the ninety-nine in safety “and go after the one which is lost until he finds it” (Luke 15:4). Jesus didn’t say: “until it either finds its way back or gets found or dies” as is traditionally taught. He said: “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw (lit. drag) all peoples to Myself” (John 12:32). [v]  It is not until the last lost sheep has been found and the last knee has bowed in submission to Him that He will cease seeking and saving the lost. At that time there will not be even one lost soul because He will have drawn all unto Himself, resulting in God becoming all in all (1Cor 15:28).

 

God doesn’t become all in all by redefining “all” to mean only “a few,” as the Traditionalists do; nor by exterminating the lost, as the Annihilationists claim He will do, but rather by seeking and saving the lost (apollumi). Perdition and destruction are not eternal. It may be eonian for some, but it cannot be eternal because Christ is committed to fulfilling His mission to seek and save all the lost, down to the very last lost sheep.

 

Many now walk the broad path leading to destruction or perdition (apoleia). For them the loss will be great. They will be excluded from the glory of His presence, consigned to an eonian destruction, being hurt by the second death – receiving their part in the lake of fire. Nevertheless, the destruction is not perpetual but eonian. They will each be judged according to their works, receiving their part or portion in the purifying lake of fire, not getting out until they have fulfilled their part. Some will receive few stripes, and others many, but no one will receive perpetual stripes as traditionally taught (Matt 5:26; Luke 12:47,59). [vi]

 

So, even though it be by fire, Christ will ultimately save even those who chose the broad way to perdition. In Luke’s parallel gospel we see that – even  as the gates are never closed in the New Jerusalem and those who are outside are invited to wash their robes so as to be granted entrance – in the same manner Jesus says in Luke’s account that after a time of separation and exclusion, “they will come from the east and the west, from the north and the south, and sit down in the kingdom of God. 30 And indeed there are last who will be first (protos), and there are first who will be last (eschatos)” (Luke 13:29,30 cf. Rev 21:25; 22:14,17). Even though some will enter first, such as the prostitutes and tax collectors, others like the self-righteous Pharisees will be, eschatologically speaking, last to enter. In the end, however, there will only be one flock and one shepherd – not because Christ will have annihilated the lost, but because He will persist in seeking and saving the lost until the last lost sheep has entered safe and sound into the fold (John 10:16).

 

In fact, the realization that we are lost or destroyed (apollumi) is a prerequisite to being saved. That is why, when the Pharisees asked the Disciples of Christ, “Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” Jesus responded, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice.’ For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance” (Matt 9:12-13). I believe that Traditionalists and Annihilationists would do well to pause and meditate upon these words because they reveal so clearly the Lord’s heart towards the lost.

 

We so easily forget that we also were at one time lost sinners who are now saved only because Jesus sought us out and saved us. We usually would admit that we were no more deserving of being rescued than the rest of the lost. Why then should we think that He saved us, yet will not save the rest, knowing that He is not a respecter of persons?  In reality, the Pharisees, who were satisfied with their own righteousness, were passed over by Jesus because He didn’t come to call those who still think they are righteous, but rather lost sinners who have come to sense their lost state and need of being saved.

 

That is why Jesus said to the Pharisees: “Assuredly, I say to you that tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you” (Matt 21:31). It is not that they will never enter, but that those who early recognize they are lost sinners in need of a Savior will enter before them. Jesus is seeking the lost in order to save them, but those who think they are not lost and needy will be passed over, just like the Pharisees, until such a time as they should be willing to receive Him as Savior.

 

It is not that Jesus has difficulty finding the lost but rather He waits until they are ripe for salvation. Upon arriving in the Colombian Amazon, I discovered many delicious tropical fruits that I had never known before. But I had to learn to distinguish between those which were ripe and those that needed to remain on the tree for more time before harvesting. I pulled some off the tree, thinking they would ripen on the shelf, but they rotted before ripening because they were not yet ready to be picked. In much the same manner, the Lord waits until each individual is ready to receive salvation before drawing them unto Himself and saving them.

 

Although God has determined that all will be saved, He has never saved anyone against their will. Nevertheless, we not only tend to underestimate the dimensions of His endless love, but also His ability to work in mankind to eventually will and to do His own good pleasure. Those who think that some can willfully reject God forever underestimate the irresistibility of His love and His power and the means which He has available to persuade and convince. God has sworn that all will be saved, bowing the knee to Him and taking an oath, saying: “Surely in the Lord I have righteousness and strength” (Isa 45:22-24). And in His time, it shall be just as He has declared.

 

In Christ all will be made alive when it is their time

 

“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the first-fruits, afterward those who are Christ's at His coming. 24 Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. 25 For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that will be destroyed (katargeo) is death. 27 For ‘He has put (subjected ‘Gr. hupotaso’) all things under His feet.’ But when He says ‘all things are put (hupotaso) under Him,’ it is evident that He who put (hupotaso) all things under Him is excepted. 28 Now when all things are made subject (hupotaso) to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject (hupotaso) to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.” (1Cor 15:22-28)

 

Here we see that the same all who die in Adam will be made alive in Christ, but not all at once, rather each in his own order. Each individual will be made alive when it is his own time. Some, such as the harlots and tax collectors who are quick to see their need receive Him now, and are purified as gold is purified with fire and salt in this age, becoming part of the assembly of the first-fruits or “those who are Christ’s at His coming.”

 

Others, like the self-righteous Pharisees or the Prodigal’s elder brother, may hold out for ages before finally bowing the knee, confessing Him as Lord. That is why Luke said that, upon hearing Paul’s preaching, all who were appointed to eternal life believed (Acts 13:48). The word “appointed” (tasso) means “arranged in an orderly manner.” The idea expressed is that we do not believe until it is our appointed time – a time which only God knows, when one has been previously prepared by Him to receive the gospel of salvation.

 

Paul, speaking about the order of those being made alive, first mentions those who are Christ’s at His coming. He follows up by saying, “then comes the end” (v.24). The word translated “end” is telos which means: “end, conclusion, fulfillment or final result. I think that perhaps the best way to understand “the end,” telos in this context is, “then comes the fulfillment.” In other words, it speaks of the fulfillment of the declaration that all will be made alive in Christ, and not just those that are Christ’s at His coming. The saying, “each in his own order,” could be understood as meaning that, after the glorification of those who are Christ’s in His coming, and those made alive in the second resurrection, it will thereafter be each in his own order. In other words, each individual will be made alive when it is their time.

 

Jesus will reign forever and ever, (eis ton aiona tou aionos) lit., “in the ages of the ages” (Heb 1:8). That the phrase eis ton aiona tou aionos is not referring to Plato’s concept of eternity is evident here in 1Corinthians 15:25-28, where it says that Christ will reign “til” or “until” He has destroyed every enemy and brought all into subjection to Himself. “Until” is not synonymous with “forever and ever” – even in Greek! Then, when all have become subjected to Him, death—the last enemy—will have been destroyed, not by annihilation, but by all having been saved and made alive in Christ (v.22). God does not destroy death by killing, tormenting forever, or annihilating, but rather by making all alive.

 

Also, here it is important to note that the only things which are said to be “destroyed” are abstract entities such as opposing governments and the last enemy – death. Here, the word translated “destruction” is not a cognate of apollumi. It is katargeo which, according to Strong’s, means: “to be (render) entirely idle (useless).” Death will once and for all be put out of commission and Jesus Christ will be the uncontested Lord of lords.  Paul says of all moral beings that they will become subjected to Him (hupotaso). It is clear that this submission is voluntary rather than forced. In fact, the same word (hupotasso) describes Christ when He ultimately subjects Himself to the Father so that God may become all in all.

 

It is also obvious that the subjection will be voluntary since otherwise God could not be said to be all in all. Annihilationists try to get around this by saying that “all” here means “all survivors,” since, according to them, all who do not comply will have been forever exterminated. However, in the context we see that God becomes all in all by all having been brought into subjection to Christ and being made alive in Him – not by killing off or annihilating the opposition. It doesn’t simply mean “all who remain” but all who have died in Adam since the fall (v.22). God’s glory is magnified – not by annihilating His enemies, but by conquering them by the power of His love – to the praise of the glory of His grace.

 

“Say to God, ‘how awesome are Your works! Through the greatness of Your power your enemies shall submit themselves to You. 4 All the earth shall worship You and sing praises to You; they shall sing praises to Your name.” (Ps 66:3-4) [vii]

 

Destruction is the prelude to Salvation

 

Many fail to see that death or destruction is a necessary prelude to one being saved and restored. Being raised in a very religious family, I would have never come to see my lost condition if I hadn’t gone into the far country, destroying my life on drugs. Only then, in my lost and hopeless state did I finally cry out to the Lord and He saved me. Some are so obstinately self-righteous or self-sufficient that they will have to be consigned to eonian destruction before finally coming to an end of themselves and calling out to the Lord for salvation, finding their righteousness only in Him. God’s destruction is in order to restore – not annihilate. He kills, but only in order to make alive with His eternal life:

 

You turn man to destruction, and say, ‘return, O children of men.” (Ps 90:3)

·       That is His way with all the children of men – first destruction, then restoration.

 

“Now see that I, even I, am He, and there is no God besides Me; I kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; nor is there any who can deliver from My hand.” (Deut 32:39)

·       No one can stay His hand: His purifying fire is unquenchable until it has accomplished its purpose, but He only kills in order to make alive; He only wounds in order to become our healer.

 

“Come, and let us return to the Lord; for He has torn, but He will heal us; He has stricken, but He will bind us up. 2 After two days He will revive us; on the third day He will raise us up, that we may live in His sight.” (Hos 6:1-2)

·       As James says, we need to see “the end intended by (of) the Lord — that the Lord is very compassionate and merciful.” (James 5:11) [viii] “Whom the Lord loves He disciplines.” (Heb 12:6)

 

When it comes to God’s plan for the ages, we tend to be too shortsighted and fail to see the end of the Lord. All too often we look at God’s judgments and His condemnation of the unrepentant to death and destruction as though it were the final tragic outcome of His frustrated will for the majority of mankind. However, in reality, it is His means of bringing them to an end of themselves so that they will finally look to Him for salvation, just as it was for each of us. We fail to understand that, when God’s judgments are in the earth – that is, when the earth-dwellers learn righteousness (Isa 26:9). Thanks be to God that we came to an end of ourselves in this life so as not to be hurt by the second death; but as Paul says, He is not only the Savior of those who believe now, but He is the Savior of the whole world:

 

“This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance. 10 For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe. These things command and teach.” (1Tim 4:9-11, c.f. 1John 2:2; John 4:42)

 

Is this universal gospel the same gospel you labor and suffer reproach to proclaim, or do you hold fast to the “good news / bad news gospel” of the salvation of the few, with the eternal perdition or destruction of the majority of lost humanity?

[i] Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Copyright © 1972-1989 By Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

 

[ii] Vine's Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words, Copyright © 1985, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

 

[iii] Ibid.

 

[iv] See chapter six

 

[v] The word “peoples” is not in the Greek text but was added by the translators, allowing Calvinists to say it only refers to “all peoples” or “people groups”.

 

[vi] See chapter six

 

[vii] The word for “submit” in this verse normally refers to a feigned submission. However, there are no words in Hebrew which express true, voluntary submission. Here it is the context itself which determines its meaning as true submission and adoration in spite of its normal meaning, since feigned submission would never result in His enemies worshipping and praising Him.

 

[viii] “intended by” was added by translators, leaving open the possibility that the Lord’s end or final goal may not be achieved. It simply reads “the end of the Lord.”

 

Published on
00:00
00:00

Chapter 1

Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 

Postmillennial Preterists tend to sweep the testimony of the early Church under the carpet, simply saying - in spite of evidence to the contrary, that the majority position of the Church from the beginning has been Preterist and not Futurist. However, even the renowned historian, Schaff, who was not himself a Futurist, recognized that the Premillennial hope was indeed held by the Early Church Fathers. He said the following concerning their eschatology:
 
“The most striking point in the eschatology of the ante-Nicene age is the prominent chiliasm, or millennarianism, that is the belief of a visible reign of Christ in glory on earth with the risen saints for a thousand years, before the general resurrection and judgment. It was indeed not the doctrine of the church embodied in any creed or form of devotion, but a widely current opinion of distinguished teachers, such as Barnabas (died AD 61), Papias (died AD 100), Justin Martyr (AD 100 – 165), Irenaeus (AD 130 – 202), Tertullian (AD 160 – 225), Methodius (died AD 311), and Lactantius (AD 250 – 325); while Caius (third century AD) , Origen (AD 184 – 253), Dionysius the Great (died AD 264), Eusebius (AD 265 – 340) as afterwards Jerome (AD 347 – 420) and Augustin (AD 354 – 430) opposed it…
In connection with this the general expectation prevailed that the return of the Lord was near, though uncertain and unascertainable as to its day and hour, so that believers may be always ready for it. This hope, through the whole age of persecution, was a copious fountain of encouragement and comfort under the pains of that martyrdom which sowed in blood the seed of a bountiful harvest for the church…
Justin Martyr…speaks repeatedly of the second parousia of Christ in the clouds of heaven, surrounded by the holy angels. It will be preceded by the near manifestation of the man of sin (anthropos tas anomias) who speaks blasphemies against the most high God, and will rule three and a half years. He is preceded by heresies and false prophets. Christ will then raise the patriarchs, prophets, and pious Jews, establish the millennium, restore Jerusalem, and reign there in the midst of his saints; after which the second and general resurrection and judgment of the world will take place.” [1]
 
Also, the early Church historian Eusebius, who died in AD 339, traced the belief in the Futuristic Premillennial hope to the very feet of John the Revelator when he said:
 
“These things are attested by Papias, an ancient man who was a hearer of John and a companion of Polycarp, in his fourth book. To these belong his statement that there will be a period of some thousand years after the resurrection of the dead, and that the kingdom of Christ will be set up in material form on this very earth.” [2]
 
I would say that the likelihood that Papias who, according to Eusebius, was taught by John himself and was a companion of Polycarp, would teach a doctrine different from that of the Apostle John, is very remote indeed. Who would most likely reflect the original teaching of John the revelator? Papias who sat at John’s feet, or the Jesuit priest Alcasar who originated Preterism as an eschatology in the 17th century?
 
I did a search of the writings of the Early Church Fathers and found that the Futuristic hope of a Premillennial return of Christ after the apostasy, the future Great Tribulation, and the manifestation of the man of sin, was a recurrent theme throughout all of their writings. They all lived many years after the A.D 70 destruction and did not see that as having been the Second Coming. If indeed Christ came in 70AD and every eye of all nations and tribes of the earth saw Him coming in power and great glory as Jesus said they would (Matt 24:30; Rev 1:7), we would expect to have record of someone having seen Him come. In fact, there is no record of anyone, Christian or non-Christian, who considered Christ to have come in AD 70. The following is a brief sampling of just a few of the references to the Futuristic hope held to by the Early Fathers:
 
Justin Martyr (AD 100 to 165)
 
“…two advents of Christ have been announced: the one, in which He is set forth as suffering, inglorious, dishonoured, and crucified; but the other, in which He shall come from heaven with glory, when the man of apostasy, who speaks strange things against the Most High, shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians…” [3]
 
“But I and others, who are right-minded Christians on all points, are assured that there will be a resurrection of the dead, and a thousand years in Jerusalem, which will then be built, adorned, and enlarged, [as] the prophets Ezekiel and Isaiah and others declare.” [4]
 
Epistle of Barnabas (AD 120 to 150)
 
“Ten kingdoms shall reign upon the earth, and a little king shall rise up after them, who shall subdue under one three of the kings. In like manner Daniel says concerning the same, ‘And I beheld the fourth beast, wicked and powerful, and more savage than all the beasts of the earth, and how from it sprang up ten horns, and out of them a little budding horn, and how it subdued under one three of the great horns.’” [5]
 
The Shepherd of Hermas (2nd Century)
 
“Go, therefore, and tell the elect of the Lord His mighty deeds, and say to them that this beast is a type of the great tribulation that is coming. If then ye prepare yourselves, and repent with all your heart, and turn to the Lord, it will be possible for you to escape it, if your heart be pure and spotless, and ye spend the rest of the days of your life in serving the Lord blamelessly.” [6]
 
Irenaeus (AD 160 to 230)
 
“But there is another among these heretics, Marcus by name, who boasts himself as having improved upon his master… Thus it appears as if he really were the precursor of Antichrist.” [7]
 
For he (Antichrist) being endued with all the power of the devil, shall come, not as a righteous king, nor as a legitimate king in subjection to God, but an impious, unjust, and lawless one; of whom the apostle thus speaks in the second Epistle to the Thessalonians: ‘Unless there shall come a falling away first, and the man of sin shall be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself as if he were God.’” [8]
 
“And for this reason the apostle says: ‘Because they received not the love of God, that they might be saved, therefore God shall also send them the operation of error, that they may believe a lie, that they all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but consented to unrighteousness.’ For when he (Antichrist) is come, and of his own accord concentrates in his own person the apostasy, and accomplishes whatever he shall do according to his own will and choice, sitting also in the temple of God, so that his dupes may adore him as the Christ; wherefore also shall he deservedly ‘be cast into the lake of fire… whose coming John has thus described in the Apocalypse… And he will cause a mark [to be put] in the forehead and in the right hand, that no one may be able to buy or sell, unless he who has the mark of the name of the beast or the number of his name; and the number is six hundred and sixty-six," that is, six times a hundred, six times ten, and six units.’” [9]
 
“But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom…and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance.” [10]
 
If, however, any shall endeavor to allegorize [prophecies] of this kind, they shall not be found consistent with themselves in all points, and shall be confuted by the teaching of the very expressions [in question].
For all these and other words were unquestionably spoken in reference to the resurrection of the just, which takes place after the coming of Antichrist, and the destruction of all nations under his rule; in [the times of] which [resurrection] the righteous shall reign in the earth.” [11]
 
Daniel too, looking forward to the end of the last kingdom, i.e., the ten last kings, amongst whom the kingdom of those men shall be partitioned, and upon whom the son of perdition shall come, declares that ten horns shall spring from the beast, and that another little horn shall arise in the midst of them, and that three of the former shall be rooted up before his face…and [everything] shall be given into his hand until a time of times and a half time,’ that is, for three years and six months, during which time, when he comes, he shall reign over the earth. Of whom also the Apostle Paul again…thus says: ‘And then shall the wicked one be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus shall slay with the spirit of His mouth, and destroy by the presence of His coming.” [12]
 
“The Lord also spoke as follows to those who did not believe in Him: ‘I have come in my Father's name, and ye have not received Me: when another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive,’ calling Antichrist ‘the other,’ because he is alienated from the Lord.  Which also he shall do in the time of his kingdom: he shall remove his kingdom into that [city], and shall sit in the temple of God, leading astray those who worship him, as if he were Christ. To this purpose Daniel says again: ‘And he shall desolate the holy place’…. And then he points out the time that his tyranny shall last, during which the saints shall be put to flight, they who offer a pure sacrifice unto God: ‘And in the midst of the week,’ he says, ‘the sacrifice and the libation shall be taken away, and the abomination of desolation [shall be brought] into the temple: even unto the consummation of the time shall the desolation be complete.’ Now three years and six months constitute the half-week.” [13]
 
Tertullian: (AD 160 to 220)
 
“Christ promises to the Jews their primitive condition, with the recovery of their country…. As for the restoration of Judea, however, which even the Jews themselves, induced by the names of places and countries, hope for just as it is described… But we do confess that a kingdom is promised to us upon the earth, although before heaven, only in another state of existence; inasmuch as it will be after the resurrection for a thousand years in the divinely-built city of Jerusalem…” [14]
 
“In the Revelation of John, again, the order of these times is spread out to view…and that the city of fornication may receive from the ten kings its deserved doom, and that the beast Antichrist with his false prophet may wage war on the Church of God; and that, after the casting of the devil into the bottomless pit for a while, the blessed prerogative of the first resurrection may be ordained from the thrones; and then again, after the consignment of him to the fire, that the judgment of the final and universal resurrection may be determined out of the books. Since, then, the Scriptures both indicate the stages of the last times, and concentrate the harvest of the Christian hope in the very end of the world, it is evident, either that all which God promises to us receives its accomplishment then…” [15] 
 
Hippolytus (AD 170 to 236)
 
“For John says, ‘And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.’ That is the half of the week whereof Daniel spake
What saith the prophet? ‘the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them,’ because they will not give glory to Antichrist
53. These things, then, shall be in the future, beloved… That refers to the one thousand two hundred and threescore days (the half of the week) during which the tyrant is to reign and persecute the Church, which flees from city to city…
62. The Lord also says, ‘When ye shall see the abomination of desolation stand in the holy place (whoso readeth, let him understand), then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains, and let him which is on the housetop not come down to take his clothes; neither let him which is in the field return back to take anything out of his house. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved.’
64. These things, then, will come to pass, beloved, and the one week being divided into two parts, and the abomination of desolation being manifested then, and the two prophets and forerunners of the Lord having finished their course, and the whole world finally approaching the consummation, what remains but the coming of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ from heaven, for whom we have looked in hope?
67. These things, then, I have set shortly before thee, O Theophilus, drawing them from Scripture itself, in order that, maintaining in faith what is written, and anticipating the things that are to be, thou mayest keep thyself void of offence both toward God and toward men, ‘looking for that blessed hope and appearing of our God and Saviour’…”  [16]
 
Cyprian (AD 200 to 258)
 
“For you ought to know and to believe, and hold it for certain, that the day of affliction has begun to hang over our heads, and the end of the world and the time of Antichrist to draw near, so that we must all stand prepared for the battle; nor consider anything but the glory of life eternal, and the crown of the confession of the Lord; and not regard those things which are coming as being such as were those which have passed away.” [17]
 
Lactantius (AD 250 – 325)
 
When the close of the times draws nigh, a great prophet shall be sent from God to turn men to the knowledge of God, and he shall receive the power of doing wonderful things….”
 
“But that king will not only be most disgraceful in himself, but he will also be a prophet of lies; and he will constitute and call himself God, and will order himself to be worshipped as the Son of God; and power will be given him to do signs and wonders, by the sight of which he may entice men to adore him. He will command fire to come down from heaven, and the sun to stand and leave his course, and an image to speak; and these things shall be done at his word, by which miracles many even of the wise shall be enticed by him. Then he will attempt to destroy the temple of God, and persecute the righteous people; and there will be distress and tribulation such as there never has been from the beginning of the world… As many as shall believe him and unite themselves to him, shall be marked by him as sheep; but they who shall refuse his mark will either flee to the mountains, or, being seized, will be slain with studied tortures. He will also enwrap righteous men with the books of the prophets, and thus burn them; and power will be given him to desolate the whole Earth for forty-two months.” [18]
 
“Therefore the Son of the most high and mighty God shall come to judge the quick and the dead, as the Sibyl testifies and says: ‘For then there shall be confusion of mortals throughout the whole Earth, when the Almighty Himself shall come on His judgment-seat to judge the souls of the quick and dead, and all the world.’
But He, when He shall have destroyed unrighteousness, and executed His great judgment, and shall have recalled to life the righteous, who have lived from the beginning, will be engaged among men a thousand years, and will rule them with most just command….
Then they who shall be alive in their bodies shall not die, but during those thousand years shall produce an infinite multitude, and their offspring shall be holy, and beloved by God; but they who shall be raised from the dead shall preside over the living as judges….
About the same time also the prince of the devils, who is the contriver of all evils, shall be bound with chains, and shall be imprisoned during the thousand years of the heavenly rule in which righteousness shall reign in the world, so that he may contrive no evil against the people of God.” [19]
 
Conclusion
 
As one can see, reading the Early Church Fathers is just like reading the present-day writings of Futuristic Premillennialists. They speak of Daniel’s 70th week of years with its final three-and-a-half years as yet future and separate in time from the first 69 weeks of years. They speak of the apostasy and the tyranny of the Antichrist beginning at the mid-point of Daniel’s 70th week and ending when he is cast into the lake of fire at Christ’s Second Coming. They speak of the abomination of desolation as being the Antichrist sitting in a rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. They speak of the mark of the Beast being required in the hand or in the forehead in order to be able to buy or sell. They speak of the final three-and-a-half years as a time of distress and tribulation such as has never been from the beginning of the world. They speak of the Second Coming and resurrection of the saints followed by Satan being bound for 1,000 years, during which time Christ will reign on the Earth with His saints.  
 
About the only thing that is altogether absent from their teaching which is heard among many Futurists today, is the mention of a rapture of the Church seven years prior to His Second Coming. To the contrary, Justin Martyr speaks of the Antichrist as doing unlawful things against us, the Church during the tribulation. Tertullian also speaks of the Antichrist with his false prophet waging war on the Church of God and Hippolytus presents the Church as being persecuted during the Great Tribulation by the Antichrist.
 
The only hint of a rapture before the Second Coming of Christ is mentioned by the Shepherd of Hermas. However, he appears to be referring to a partial “pre-Great Tribulation rapture” which would occur at the mid-point of Daniel’s 70th week, rather than at its beginning, as Pretribulationists teach. He seems to speak of this “escape” as only including those who have already prepared themselves prior to the Great Tribulation and for that reason will have no need of further purification in the fires of affliction. (For more on this subject see my book entitled: Focusing in on End-time Events”). However, a pretribulation rapture seven years prior to the Second Coming of Christ is also of recent origin and is not an essential element of Futuristic eschatology.
 
Therefore, we see that the Futurist Premillennial interpretation was that which was held by our Early Church Fathers. It is true that Amillennialism became predominant in the 5th Century, having been conceived through Origin’s spiritual/allegorical approach to Scriptures, and further developed and popularized by Augustine. It ruled the day throughout the Dark Ages and even into the beginnings of the Reformation. However, it is my conviction that we need to continue the Reformation until every historic biblical doctrine has been fully restored to the way they were before entering into the Dark Ages.
 
This blog is an excerpt from my book: Last Days – Past or Present?
 


[1] Schaff´s History of the Christian Church, Volume 1, chapter 12,158. Chiliasm.
 

[2] Eusebius Church History Chapter 39 – The writings of Papias
 

[3] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Justin Martyr; Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter 110
 

[4] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Justin Martyr; Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter 80 - The Opinion of Justin with Regard to the Reign of a Thousand Years.
 

[5] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Epistle of Barnabus Chapter 4
 

[6] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Pastor of Hermas; Book 1 Visions Chapter 2
 

[7] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1 Irenaeus; Against Heresies Book 1 Chapter 13
 

[8] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 25 section 1
 

[9] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 28 section 2
 

[10] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 30 section 4
 

[11] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 35 section 1
 

[12] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 35 section 4
 

[13] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 25 section 3,4
 

[14] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 3 Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 3 Chapter 24
 

[15] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 3, Tertullian: (AD 160 to 220) Apologetic Writings – The chaplet, Chapter 25
 

[16] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 5, Hyppolytus (AD 170 to 236),Treatise on the Antichrist, Sections 47-67
 

[17] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 5, Cyprian (AD 200 to 258) The Epistles of Cyprian, Epistle 55 §1
 

[18] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Lactantius  (AD 250 – AD 325) Volume 7, Book 7, Chapter 17
 

[19] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 7, Lactantius (AD 250 – AD 325) Volume 7, Book 7, Chapter 24 – Of the Renewed World.
 
Published on
Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 
“And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, 25 not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.” (Heb 10:24-25)
 
 
If you have attended church services for any length of time, without a doubt you have noticed that we are living in a time when an alarming number of Christians are no longer congregating with those of like faith, and the few who still do often attend megachurches where there is little or no body-life or one-on-one interaction.
 
I had a life-transforming encounter with the Lord in 1969 during what became known as the Jesus Movement Revival. At that time, local churches were usually small but well attended by vibrant believers with a passion for the Lord, their first love. For most of us, just two services on Sundays with a midweek Bible study and Friday night prayer meeting wasn’t enough. When we came together, the presence of the Lord was so real and tangible that we didn’t want to leave and we couldn’t wait for the next meeting.
 
Sadly, if you were to visit those same churches today, what you would often discover is that, if the church hasn’t already closed its doors, the attendance is minimal, often only meeting once a week on Sundays. Currently there are many more local churches that are closing their doors than there are new churches being planted. Why this great exodus from the local churches?
 
Obviously, the root problem is a heart condition. When Christ is the center of our affection and devotion, His life is manifested in our midst and He is able to draw others to Himself through us. But all too often, little by little, He ceases to be the center of our affection, and the next thing we know, we have left our first love (Rev 2:1-7). We may still be attending church and carrying out the same activities – in fact many intensify them, but it is done out of a sense of duty rather than pure devotion. We may still pray, but without the intimate communion we once enjoyed.
 
When the Church holds fast to Christ, her Head, it grows with a growth that God gives (Col 2:19). While the Church in Acts simply continued steadfastly in communion, the Lord added to the Church daily those who were being saved, and the number of disciples multiplied greatly (Acts 2:46-47; 6:7). The only way that the enemy can stop the growth that God gives is to seduce us away from our simplicity of devotion to Christ, our Head, resulting in His life no longer being manifested in our midst. That was Paul’s primary concern with the believers at Corinth. He said:
 
“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.” (2 Cor 11:3 NIV)
 
Christ is the source of life for us individually, and also collectively as His body, the Church. If we remove Christ from the center of our lives and church-life for whatever reason, the fountain of life that causes us to flourish spiritually dries up. As Jesus said, “separate from me you can do nothing” (Jn 15:5). No amount of religious activity, however correct and biblical it may be, can produce life. No amount of organizational structure, or lack thereof, can produce the increase that only He can give.
 
A pastor friend of mine here in Colombia sought to plant a church using a popular church growth strategy which has produced megachurches here in Colombia and throughout Latin America. He related how that one night he couldn’t get to sleep because he kept calculating in his mind how many members he could have in his congregation in six months or in a year using this strategy. After several hours, he still couldn’t shut off his mind and go to sleep. When he asked the Lord to help him go to sleep, he felt the Lord say to him: “Don’t seek numbers. Seek my face and I will take care of the numbers.” From that moment on, he abandoned the church-growth strategy and instead began to focus on developing intimacy with the Lord. Shortly afterwards, the presence of God descended upon their small congregation, and within a few months he couldn’t find buildings big enough to contain the multitudes that came to drink of the water of life.
 
Sadly, when this multiplication led to a great inflow of money, little by little I saw his focus shift from Christ to material prosperity. The awe of Christ’s presence, which was what initially produced such vibrant growth, began to diminish in the measure that the focus shifted from Christ to personal wealth. In a desperate attempt to compensate for the lack of His manifest presence, they began to use light shows and special effects, with him even once coming on stage on a stunt motorcycle like Evel Knievel with fireworks and all. However, there is absolutely nothing, including special effects, that can bring life and vitality to a congregation apart from simple devotion to Christ.
 
Paul’s concern was that we not be seduced away from our sincere and pure devotion to Christ. What are some of the things that can seduce us away from Christ as our first love?
 
Materialism
 
“Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” (1 John 2:15)
 
I believe that perhaps the primary reason why believers have lost their first love, resulting in the decline in church attendance, especially in America, is materialism. Materialism is defined as “placing more value on material possessions than spiritual values.” It is the pursuit of things, rather than God, and is a form of idolatry (Col 3:5). Jesus said:
 
“No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.” (Luke 16:13 NIV)
 
The problem is not with one having an abundance of material possessions, but rather material-ism, or the love of things at the expense of our love and full devotion to God. Many of us who were saved during the Jesus Movement were formerly drug addicts or hippies, having come to the Lord with practically nothing but the clothes on our back. Our main focus and passion was our relationship with the Lord. However, I began to note that as many of us began to prosper, buying houses, cars and boats, for many, their relationship with the Lord subtly began to take a backseat to their preoccupation with their material possessions. Many either skipped Sunday services to go boating or cruising on their motorcycles, whereas
others simply attended church out of a sense of duty, wishing they were somewhere else.
 
Gradually, I saw materialism become an obsession in society and even within the churches. In the 1960s and 70s all the stores were closed on Sundays. The streets were empty on Sunday mornings and the churches were full. However, little by little that shifted, until today in most cities the shopping centers are now full on Sundays while the churches are empty. The church in America has become like the Laodiceans who said that they were rich and in need of nothing, without realizing that, as to their spiritual condition, they were wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked (Rev 3:14-22). It is well and good to possess material things, but they should never possess us. If we discover that we would rather be with our things than to congregate where the Lord is in the midst of His people, we need to return to our first love.
 
Lawlessness
 
“And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold.” (Matt 24:12)
 
A major cause of the decrease in church attendance within the last few years is the increase of lawlessness. The Apostle John equates lawlessness with sin (1Jn 3:4). Sin (ἁμαρτία) is a missing of the mark, whereas lawlessness (ἀνομία) is a refusal to submit to a law or moral standard. Therefore, taken together, lawlessness in Scripture is a willful missing the mark of God’s moral standard.
 
Jesus said that towards the end, just prior to His return, the rejection of God’s moral restraints will result in the love of many growing cold. As long as Jesus is our first love, we will keep His commandments (Jn 14:15). Conversely, as long as we keep His commandments we abide in His love. Jesus said: “If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father's commandments and abide in His love” (Jn 15:10).
 
However, beginning with the moral revolution of the 70s, with their slogan, “If it feels good, do it,” society as a whole began to reject God’s moral standards, and little by little, through entertainment, media and the educational system, the conscience of many within the churches began to be desensitized to the point where today the love of many within the churches has grown cold. They often talk about the unconditional love of God for them but then show their lack of any real love for Him by their disobedience.
 
Today many Christians actually call good what God calls evil, and evil what God calls good. They have made God in their own image to the point where some think that the grace of God frees us to live as we choose without any consequences, and even accuse those who truly love God and endeavor to obey Him of being modern-day Pharisees.
 
Jesus Christ is grace personified. Therefore, Christ or Grace personified in us will produce His obedience in us as we simply abide in His love, Just as He obeyed His Father, abiding in the Father’s love (Jn 15:10). John said that we know we are in Him by the fact that we walk just as He walked (1Jn 2:5-6). He also said: “Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous” (1Jn 3:7).
 
Sadly, the reason why many no longer congregate is because they are practicing sin and want to remain in darkness lest their sinful conduct should be exposed by the light. The Apostle John said: “God is light and in Him is no darkness at all” (1Jn 1:5-7). As Jesus said, the unrepentant do not want to come to the light lest their sinful deeds be exposed. In contrast, the repentant want to congregate with others in the light of His presence so that any sin that remains in their lives can be brought to the light and removed (Jn 3:19-21; Psa 139:23-24).
 
When we are closely connected with other believers in the context of a local church, we receive the daily exposure to the word and the fellowship which helps us to remain spiritually focused upon Christ. Only those who are connected to a local assembly can put into practice the scriptural injunction which says, “exhort one another daily, while it is called ‘Today,’ lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin” (Heb 3:13).
 
False Teachers
 
Another major reason for the great exodus from the churches which we are witnessing in our day is that many are being drawn away from the faith by false teachers. Paul said that in the last days many would depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons (1Tim 4:1). He referred to them as savage wolves who would come in among us, not sparing the flock (Acts 20:29-31).
 
Peter likewise said that the time would come when there would be false teachers among us who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who purchased us with His own blood (2Peter 2:1). Today, it is not uncommon to hear teachers denying the deity of Christ or making light of His substitutionary atonement by which He redeemed us to the Father, shedding His own blood. Often today, the churches in the community are empty, while the Kingdom Hall of the Jehovah Witnesses is filled with former church members who no longer believe in the deity of Christ or salvation by grace apart from works.
 
This is one of the main reasons why we are commanded to not forsake the assembling of ourselves together, especially now, seeing that the day of His appearing approaches. God has appointed elders in the local churches as overseers to shepherd or pastor the flock and protect believers from false teachers that, as savage wolves, prey on the Lord’s flock. Paul said to the elders:
 
“Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds (pastors) of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood. 29 I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. 30 Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. 31 So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears.” (Acts 20:28-31)
 
False teachers do not usually outright deny truth. Rather, in order to prey on the sheep who are not yet firmly rooted and grounded in the truth of God’s Word, they dress in sheep’s clothing, subtly distorting the truth in order to deceive and thereby draw the disciples away from the faith. Paul said that they deceitfully scheme by trickery and craftiness through philosophy and empty deceit according to the wisdom of the world, and not according to Christ (Eph 4:14-16; Col 2:8-10). Their arguments often have the appearance of wisdom, and they use such convoluted and lofty logic that even the most intellectual scholars have difficulty interpreting their reasoning, let alone a Christian with little real knowledge of the Scriptures.
 
There is a God-ordained structure within each local church for the equipping of the saints which is essential for the preservation and growth of the body of Christ.  Simply attending a megachurch or connecting through the internet to Zoom meetings and Facebook groups can never substitute for the essential body-life within a local church. As the writer of Hebrews said, if there ever was a time when God’s people needed to be under the ministry of the local churches it is now as that day draws near.
 
One problem with this generation is that many have become self-willed and independent and unwilling to subject themselves to the leadership of a local church. Christ has appointed pastors and teachers for the equipping of the saints for the work of the ministry but, all too often, Christians today are not willing to submit to the God-ordained authority within a local assembly. The author of Hebrews, recognizing this human tendency, admonishes believers, saying:
 
“Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you.” (Heb 13:17)
 
“Remember those who rule over you, who have spoken the word of God to you, whose faith follow, considering the outcome of their conduct.” (Heb 13:7)
 
A Christian who is not a part of a local assembly and in submission to those given the oversight is depriving himself or herself of the God-ordained structure necessary for our protection and proper development within the body of Christ. At the same time, Peter, recognizing the possibility of those in authority abusing their office as overseers says:
 
“Shepherd (pastor) the flock of God which is among you, serving as overseers, not by compulsion but willingly, not for dishonest gain but eagerly; 3 nor as being lords over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock; 4 and when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that does not fade away.” (1 Peter 5:2-4)
 
So, while the members of a local church are commanded to submit to those in authority over them, he also tells those in authority not to abuse it by lording over the flock but to lead by being an example. When each member of the body is in their God-ordained position within the local church, each member within the body of Christ grows with the increase that God supplies. Paul sets this forth in Ephesians 4. He said of Christ and His Church:
 
“And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head — Christ —  16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.” (Eph 4:11-16)
 
I have heard many say that they no longer attend a church because they were offended or mistreated by a pastor or other church members. However, learning to bear with one another and forgiving one another, even as Christ forgave us, is essential in order to grow in agape love. One will never increase in love by rejecting those who reject, hurt, or offend us. As members of His body, we must determine to arm ourselves with the mind of Christ. Paul says:
 
“Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering; bearing with one another, and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even as Christ forgave you, so you also must do.” (Col 3:12-13)
 
As those who believe in the final salvation of all, it is inevitable that we will experience a certain amount of rejection in spite of every effort on our part to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Eph 4:3-5). However, in most cases one can find a church in their area that will receive us once they see that we agree on all the essentials of the faith, as long as we don’t cause division.
 
The unity of the Spirit doesn’t require agreement upon every point of doctrine. To the contrary, it actually requires unity in spite of disagreement on some non-essentials, since none of us see eye-to-eye on everything. However, even if we are not able to find a local church of like faith in our area, neglecting the assembling of ourselves together with other believers should never be considered an option as members of the body of Christ. If we cannot find a church in our area, we should pray about starting a home-group and inviting friends and neighbors. That is how many churches began.
 
In conclusion, I will cite the same admonition I presented at the beginning:
 
“And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching.” (Heb 10:24-25)
Published on
00:00
00:00

)Last Days Past or Present? (2 of 2)

Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 
Every generation of believers who has loved or longed for Christ’s return have held on to the blessed hope of the glorious appearing of our Lord within their own lifetime, just as we have been exhorted to do (2Tim 4:8; Titus 2:13; Mark 13:37).  
 
However, within just the last few years a growing number of Christians have abandoned the blessed hope, instead embracing Preterism, which is the belief that the last days are behind us – that Christ already returned in 70AD, destroying Jerusalem through the Roman armies, binding Satan in the abyss and initiating His millennial reign on earth.
 
In the title of his book, one Partial Preterist expresses the common sentiment of Preterists towards those who still believe that we are living in the last days, entitling it, “Last Days Madness.” [1] In the previous blog, Where is the Promise of His Coming? I briefly sought to demonstrate from Scripture that the Second Coming is yet future. The objective of this blog is to also demonstrate that the prophecies concerning the last days were not fulfilled in 70AD and that many of them have yet to occur.
 
Two Distinct Sets of Prophecies concerning the Last Days
 
What many fail to take into account is that there are two sets of prophesies concerning the last days. First, there are prophecies given to the people of Israel in the Old Testament concerning the last days, beginning with the coming of Christ, their Messiah. Then, there are the prophecies given to the Church concerning the last days and the Second Coming of Christ.
 
For Israel, the first event in the last days was the coming of their Messiah and King to set up His kingdom on earth from Jerusalem after a prolonged period of dispersion. Several passages prophesied concerning this coming restoration of the nation and the Messianic reign which would begin in the last days:
 
“For the children of Israel shall abide many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillar, without ephod or teraphim. 5 Afterward the children of Israel shall return and seek the Lord their God and David their king. They shall fear the Lord and His goodness in the latter days.” (Hos 3:4-5)
“Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, that I will raise to David a Branch of righteousness; a King shall reign and prosper and execute judgment and righteousness in the earth. 6 In His days Judah will be saved, and Israel will dwell safely; Now this is His name by which He will be called: THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS (Yahweh Tsidquenu). 7 Therefore, behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, that they shall no longer say, ‘as the Lord lives who brought up the children of Israel from the land of Egypt,’ 8 but, ‘As the Lord lives who brought up and led the descendants of the house of Israel from the north country and from all the countries where I had driven them.’ And they shall dwell in their own land.” (Jer 23:5-8).
“Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the Lord's house
Shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. 3 Many people shall come and say, ‘Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; He will teach us His ways, and we shall walk in His paths. For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. 4 He shall judge between the nations, and rebuke many people; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.” (Isa 2:2-4)
 
As one can see from the above prophesies concerning the latter days, the coming of Christ, Israel’s Messiah, was the first indicator that they were in the last days when all Israel would turn to the Lord and He would restore them as a nation, reigning over the nations of the world from Jerusalem. However, Israel rejected their Messiah and King when Christ formally presented Himself in the triumphal entry. It was upon rejecting His kingdom offer that Jesus said to them: the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it” (Matt 21:43). Then He told them that they would be left desolate because they did not recognize the hour of their visitation:
 
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!  38 See! Your house is left to you desolate; 39 for I say to you, you shall see Me no more until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’” (Matt 23:37-39, cf. Luke 19:44)
 
So, when the time came for Israel’s promised last days restoration of the kingdom, the kingdom was temporarily taken from them until such a time when they would receive Him. Instead of Israel being regathered from the dispersion and Christ reigning from Jerusalem, Jesus told the Jews in Judea that they also would be dispersed, just as the northern tribes before them, and that Jerusalem would be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles should be fulfilled (Luke 21:24). Only after that will the remaining last days prophesies concerning Israel be fulfilled when Christ comes a second time to deliver and restore them.
 
The disciples, knowing about the prophesies concerning Israel’s restoration in the last days and failing to understand that Israel had been set aside in judgment, asked Jesus after He had risen from the dead if He was going to restore the kingdom to Israel at that time (Acts 1:6). They were correct in their understanding as to the sequence of events prophesied concerning the last days for Israel, but they failed to see that, due to Israel’s rejection of the kingdom, the clock for their prophetic calendar had stopped. Israel was temporarily set aside in judgment until the times of the Gentiles should be fulfilled and the fullness of the Gentiles entered into the fold.  Then the clock will resume for them and all Israel will be saved (Rom 11:25-29).
 
It is for this reason that the author of Hebrews, as well as Peter, spoke of the incarnation and earthly ministry of Christ as having occurred “in these last days” (Heb 1:1-2; 1Peter 1:20-21). Yet, at the same time, Peter spoke of the last days as something still in the future. He said:
 
“knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” (2 Peter 3:3-4)
 
Here we see Peter telling believers around 65AD what would occur in their future in the last days. Around the same time, Paul also spoke of the latter days as being yet future, saying: “in the latter times some will depart from the faith…”, “the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine…”, and “in the last days perilous times will come because men will be lovers of self…” (1Tim 4:1-2; 2Tim 4:1-5; 3:1-6). Obviously, if Preterism were true, Peter and Paul wouldn’t have been speaking of the last days as something yet future. Being so near to 70AD, surely they would have emphasized that they were already living in the last days.
 
The reason why the New Testament authors could at times refer to the last days as present and also future is because there are two sets of prophesies concerning the last days. From the time of the incarnation of Yahweh Tsidquenu, their Messiah, they were in the last days for Israel, which, due to their rejection of Him, were frozen in time until the times of the restoration of all, prophesied in the Old Testament (Acts 3:19-21).
At the same time, they were entering into the times of the Gentiles, which will continue until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, which will occur in the last days for the Church, when Christ will return. This age ends with the New Testament signs of the end of the age and the Second Coming of Christ dovetailing with the remainder of the signs of the last days given to Israel in the Old Testament.
 
Last Day Events Yet to be Fulfilled
 
Preterists claim that the last days concluded and Christ returned in 70AD, ushering in the new age. However, there are numerous prophesies concerning the last days in both testaments which have yet to be fulfilled. Here we will be examining a few of them.
 
The Invasion of Israel by Russia in the Latter Years
 
The expression “latter years” and “latter days” are used interchangeably in Ezekiel 38, indicating that they refer to the same point in history. Therefore, if we establish that the “latter years are yet future, then all the fifteen times where the “latter days are mentioned can be assumed to refer to the same future time. Looking at Ezekiel 38 and 39, it is clear that the latter days, or latter years, are yet future:
 
“Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him, 3 and say, ‘Thus says the Lord God: ‘Behold, I am against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal. 4 I will turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses, and horsemen, all splendidly clothed, a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords. 5 Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet; 6 Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops — many people are with you… 8 After many days you will be visited. In the latter years you will come into the land of those brought back from the sword and gathered from many people on the mountains of Israel, which had long been desolate; they were brought out of the nations, and now all of them dwell safely. 9 You will ascend, coming like a storm, covering the land like a cloud, you and all your troops and many peoples with you…’ 14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say to Gog, ‘Thus says the Lord God: ‘On that day when My people Israel dwell safely, will you not know it? 15 Then you will come from your place out of the far north, you and many peoples with you, all of them riding on horses, a great company and a mighty army. 16 You will come up against My people Israel like a cloud, to cover the land. It will be in the latter days that I will bring you against My land, so that the nations may know Me, when I am hallowed in you, O Gog, before their eyes.” (Ezek 38:2-9,14-16)
 
While it is not the objective of this blog to enter into detail concerning the fulfillment of this prophecy, it is definitely referring to a yet future event in the latter days.  History has not recorded an allied invasion against Israel which fits this description. 
 
In the first place, it states that the invasion will take place at a time referred to as the latter years or the latter days when Israel will have been re-gathered into the land. In the first century, Israel had not yet been fully regathered into the land of Israel. On more than one occasion we see reference to those Jews who were still dispersed among the nations in the first century:
 
“James, a bondservant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad: Greetings.” (James 1:1; cf. Jn 7:35; 1Peter 1:1; Acts 26:7)
 
Obviously, in the times of Christ the majority among the twelve tribes were still scattered in the dispersion. Some would say that the ten northern tribes were forever lost. However, Paul, in Acts 26:7 refers to the twelve tribes as existing in his day. The promised re-gathering of the nation of Israel, which we see referred to several times in the Old Testament, had not yet occurred in AD 70 (cf. Hosea 3:4; Isa 11:9-11; Ezek 37:21-38:12). Therefore, the latter-day re-gathering of Israel, when David shall be their king for the coming ages, has not yet been fulfilled.
 
It is important to understand that even before Israel crossed over the Jordan into the Promised Land, the Lord, who knows the end from the beginning, told Israel that they would be conquered and scattered among the nations until the latter days, at which time they would be restored, never to be dispersed again. God said to Israel in Deuteronomy four:
 
“I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that you will soon utterly perish from the land which you cross over the Jordan to possess; you will not prolong your days in it, but will be utterly destroyed. 27 And the Lord will scatter you among the peoples, and you will be left few in number among the nations where the Lord will drive you. 28 And there you will serve gods, the work of men's hands, wood and stone, which neither see nor hear nor eat nor smell. 29 But from there you will seek the Lord your God, and you will find Him if you seek Him with all your heart and with all your soul. 30 When you are in distress, and all these things come upon you in the latter days, when you turn to the Lord your God and obey His voice 31 (for the Lord your God is a merciful God), He will not forsake you nor destroy you, nor forget the covenant of your fathers which He swore to them.” (Deut 4:26-31; cf. Ezek 37:21-27; Isa 2:2-4)
 
In Deuteronomy 4, we clearly see that none of Israel’s actions have taken God by surprise. From the moment God called Abraham, He knew that his descendants would reject and crucify their Messiah. That was included in His eternal plan. Also included in that plan was His irrevocable oath that He would not forsake nor destroy Israel, but that they would be re-gathered and restored in the latter days, never to be scattered again. Therefore, we can clearly see that the last days do not refer to Israel’s destruction in 70 AD, but rather they refer to Israel’s re-gathering and deliverance at the time of Christ’s future Second Coming when they shall say, “blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.”  
 
In the second place, Israel has not yet been invaded by the allied forces described in this prophecy. While it is debated, Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, most probably has reference to modern day Russia. Meshech and Tubal seem to be referring to the western and southern regions of Russia (Rosh). Before the Bolshevik revolution, the western capital was Moscow, which is believed by some to have evolved from Meshech, and the eastern capital is Tobolsk which is said to have evolved from Tubal. Several of the other nations mentioned as participating with Russia are presently allied with Russia against Israel. Also, we see that God’s divine intervention for Israel’s deliverance will be so obviously supernatural that all nations will know that He is the Lord (Ezek 39:6-7). Such an unprecedented deliverance for Israel indicates that we have yet to see this battle take place. Therefore, the latter days have not yet reached their culmination. This battle certainly did not occur in the Preterist's 70AD “last days” destruction event. The battle of Ezekiel 38-39 is said to save Israel from their enemies, not destroy her.
 
Some have argued that Ezekiel cannot be referring to modern day Russia, since the description of weaponry does not correspond to a modern-day battle. However, even if Ezekiel was shown a modern battle in his vision, he would have still described it with terms familiar to the people of his day so that they could understand him. There were not even words in their vocabulary to adequately describe modern weaponry.
 
Christ Reigns from Jerusalem in the Latter Days
 
We also see in the Old Testament Scriptures that the latter days not only marks the end of “man’s day,” but also introduces us into the Day of the Lord, when war shall be no more because the Lord will have set up His throne in Jerusalem:   
 
“Now it shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and peoples shall flow to it. 2 Many nations shall come and say, ‘Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; He will teach us His ways, and we shall walk in His paths. ‘For out of Zion the law shall go forth, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. 3 He shall judge between many peoples, and rebuke strong nations afar off; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore. 4 But everyone shall sit under his vine and under his fig tree, and no one shall make them afraid; for the mouth of the Lord of hosts has spoken. 5 For all people walk each in the name of his god, but we will walk in the name of the Lord our God Forever and ever. 6 ‘In that day,’ says the Lord, ‘I will assemble the lame, I will gather the outcast and those whom I have afflicted; 7 I will make the lame a remnant, and the outcast a strong nation; so the Lord will reign over them in Mount Zion from now on, even forever.” (Mic 4:1-7)
 
Cleary, this prophesy is yet to be fulfilled when the Deliverer comes from Zion to save Israel (Rom 11:25-29). That which occurred in Jerusalem in 70AD was the exact opposite of that which this prophesy concerning the last days is describing.
 
The Resurrection of the Dead is at the End of Days, after the Great Tribulation
 
Another event that marks the last days, which has not yet occurred, is the resurrection of the dead. That it is a bodily resurrection and not merely a spiritual one, as some Preterists would affirm, is evident from Daniel’s description, where he speaks of it as the awakening of those sleeping in the dust of the earth:
 
“At that time Michael shall stand up, the great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book. 2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt. 3 Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament, and those who turn many to righteousness like the stars forever and ever. 4 But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase… 9 And he said, Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand. 11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice is taken away, and the abomination of desolation is set up, there shall be one thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12 Blessed is he who waits, and comes to the one thousand three hundred and thirty-five days. 13 But you, go your way till the end; for you shall rest, and will arise to your inheritance at the end of the days.” (Dan 12:1-4; 9-13)
 
Here we see, just as presented in the New Testament, that the resurrection takes place after the Great Tribulation. Daniel is told that he will rise to his inheritance at the end of the days. Are we to understand by this that Daniel was resurrected in 70AD? Of course not! The resurrection is at the end of days, after the future Great Tribulation, at the same time that the living are caught up to meet the Lord in the air (1Thess 4:16-17).
 
Jesus also referred to the resurrection as taking place at the time of the end or the last day:
 
“This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.  40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” (John 6:39-40)
 
Scoffers in the Last Days
 
There is another passage in the New Testament that, to me, clearly militates against the claim that the last days ended in 70AD, as Preterists claim. Peter says in 2 Peter three:
 
“knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, ‘Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.’ 5 For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, 6 by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. 7 But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. 8 But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. 11 Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, 12 looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 13 Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.” (2Peter 3:3-13)
 
According to the Preterists, the last days ended, and the Day of the Lord commenced in AD 70. However, in this passage we see that, due to the apparent delay of the Lord’s coming, many will begin to scoff at Christians for their continued hope in His return. He explains that the reason for the Lord’s delay is His longsuffering toward us, not willing that any of us should perish. However, he says that the day will come suddenly. When the day of the Lord does come, it says that the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat - bringing in the new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. This is very obviously referring to a yet future Day of the Lord. Nothing occurred in 70AD, which could in any way be said to correspond to that which is here described.
 
Nevertheless, Preterists attempt to argue that it was actually fulfilled in 70AD. Instead of seeing it as having reference to those who will come scoffing prior to a future Second Coming to bring deliverance, the Preterist Jonathan Welton explains in his book, Raptureless: “the Christians were being mocked for believing that Jesus was actually coming to bring judgment upon the Temple.” [2] However, Peter says that at that time the heavens will pass away, and the earth will be burned up. How does Welton explain that? He doesn’t attempt to explain how the heavens could have passed away at that time, but he does try to argue that the reference to the “earth” being burned up in the Day of the Lord, only refers to the land of Israel being burned in 70AD. He says:
 
“The word for ‘earth’ used here in the Greek is ge, not kosmos. Ge is the word for ‘land,’ whereas kosmos is the word for ‘the whole world.’ This is not about the destruction of the Planet Earth (kosmos), but it is about the destruction of the land of Israel (ge).” [3]
 
However, his argument does not hold up under scrutiny. As I further demonstrate in my book Last Days – Past or Present?, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the Greek word ge is the proper name of our planet, just as “the Earth” to us normally means Planet Earth, and even moreso when accompanied by the definite article. Especially when we see the earth mentioned in relation to the heavens, we know instinctively that it is referring to the entire Planet Earth. Therefore, this exhortation for godly living is applicable to the entire Church all around the world and not just to the Christians who happened to be living in Jerusalem before AD 70.
 
It further states in 2Peter 3:10 that the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat. The obvious sense of the elements melting with a fervent heat is that it refers to the recreation of heaven and earth. However, that does not fit well with a 70AD fulfillment. How does Welton explain this? Incredibly, he argues that the elements that are melted with a fervent heat refer to the elementary rituals and observances of feast days mentioned by the apostle Paul. [4]
 
If indeed the context were to indicate that Peter was actually talking about the observances of the rituals of the Law, we could possibly, with a little creative imagination, construe the “melting of the elements with a fervent heat” to have reference to the passing of the Old Covenant Law. However, the context is not speaking of the Law, but rather the heavens and the earth, which will be melted down and made anew in the Day of the Lord.
 
The Antichrist and the Last Hour
 
Before leaving the subject of the last days, I would like to consider a verse which, as translated in some versions, could lead one to believe that John thought they were living at the very end of the age:
 
“Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.” (1John 2:18)
 
As rendered, John seems to be saying that the presence of antichrist gnostic teachers indicated that they were in the final hour when the prophesied Antichrist was to appear. However, this wouldn’t lend support to a 70AD coming, since 1John was written between 95 and 100AD, long after the destruction of Jerusalem. Also, in the original Greek, the phrase “last hour” in both instances is anarthrous (without the definite article), as we see expressed in a literal translation of the text:
 
“Little children, it is a last hour, and as you heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have risen up, from which you know that it is a last hour.” (1John 2:18 LITV) 
 
The absence of the definite article in Greek does not necessarily constitute the noun indefinite as in English, but rather emphasizes its character or qualities. Therefore, what John was actually saying was that the times in which they were living had the characteristics of the final hour, due to the presence of antichrists. However, at the same time, he makes it clear that the Antichrist was yet to come on the scene. He did not say that it was the last hour, but rather that it bore resemblance to the last hour. The Greek scholar Kenneth Wuest captures the true sense of 1 John 2:18 in his translation. It reads:
 
it is a last hour in character. And even as you heard that Antichrist comes, even now, antichrists, many of them, have arisen and are here; from which fact we know by experience that it is a last hour in character.” [5]
 
Welton argues that the Antichrist is not a personage yet to come, but rather a system of teaching. He says: “The antichrist isn’t a person; it is a belief system, specifically, Gnosticism.[6] To do this, he must establish that the word antichrist is not a proper noun, and therefore does not refer to a person, but to a belief system. He argues the following:
 
“The reason for the capitalization is because the translators inserted the word the before the word antichrist, thus making antichrist into a proper noun, which requires capitalization. The early Church had heard that antichrist (false teaching) was coming, but they had not heard that the Antichrist (a One-World ruler) was coming. The insertion of the and the capitalization of Antichrist was added 1,500 years later by the translators.” [7]
 
In response, I would like to point out that the Byzantine text, which is representative of the majority of the extant Greek texts, does appear with the Greek definite article, and for that reason, “Antichrist” appears capitalized in the majority of the translations. Even if one places more weight upon the few earlier texts which exclude the article, the absence of the article doesn’t indicate that it is not a proper name. Proper names very often occur in the Greek text without an article.
 
Also, contrary to what Welton claims, we see that the early Church understood the Antichrist to be a person who would come in their future and not just a belief system. [8] Being themselves Greek speaking, and the closest in time to the teaching of the apostles, we should be reluctant to discount their understanding of the Antichrist.
 
Conclusion
 
In summary, we have seen that most of the prophesies concerning the last days, whether they be those of the Old Testament, or those of the New Testament, have yet to be fulfilled. Therefore, the references to the last days in Scripture do not apply to the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem. Looking at the present situation in the world and in many of the churches, I am convinced that we are now living in the last days and that Jesus will soon return.
 
Some say that this subject isn’t worth contending for. However, I am convinced that perhaps the greatest end-time deception of our day is the Preterist’s denial that we are living in the end-times, since it results in the very generation of Christians who most need to be watchful, ignoring the signs of the end and the warnings concerning the end-times deception and a final apostacy or deconstruction, departing from the faith. In closing, I would like to leave the reader with a few of the relevant passages to ponder, passages which are being ignored as being irrelevant by many Preterists in our generation:
 
“Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; 4 and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. 5 But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.” (2 Tim 4:2-5) 
 
“Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith (deconstruct), giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron.” (1Tim 4:1-2)
 
“But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away!” (2 Tim 3:1-5)
 
“knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” (2 Peter 3:3-4)
 
“Then if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Christ!' or 'There!' do not believe it.  24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.  25 See, I have told you beforehand… 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be.” (Matt 24:23-25,27)
 
And he said, ‘Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.’” (Dan 12:9-10)
 
This blog is in part an extract from my book, Last Days – Past or Present?


[1] Gary Demar, Last Day Madness: Obsession of the Modern Church.
 

[2] Welton, Jonathan (2013-11-01). Raptureless: An Optimistic Guide to the End of the World - Revised Edition Including The Art of Revelation (Kindle Locations 2017-2018). BookBaby. Kindle Edition.
 

[3] Welton, Jonathan (2013-11-01). Raptureless: An Optimistic Guide to the End of the World - Revised Edition Including The Art of Revelation (Kindle Locations 2042-2044). BookBaby. Kindle Edition.
 

[4] Welton, Jonathan (2013-11-01). Raptureless: An Optimistic Guide to the End of the World - Revised Edition Including The Art of Revelation (Kindle Locations 2072-2190). BookBaby. Kindle Edition.
 

[5] An Expanded Translation by Kenneth S. Wuest
 

[6] Welton, Jonathan (2013-11-01). Raptureless: An Optimistic Guide to the End of the World - Revised Edition Including The Art of Revelation (Kindle Locations 2262-2263). BookBaby. Kindle Edition.
 

[7] Welton, Jonathan (2013-11-01). Raptureless: An Optimistic Guide to the End of the World - Revised Edition Including The Art of Revelation (Kindle Locations 2268-2271). BookBaby. Kindle Edition.
 

[8]Irenaeus (AD 160 to 230)“But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father…”
For he (Antichrist) being endued with all the power of the devil, shall come, not as a righteous king, nor as a legitimate king in subjection to God, but an impious, unjust, and lawless one…”
 
Tertullian: (AD 160 to 220)
“…that the city of fornication may receive from the ten kings its deserved doom, and that the beast Antichrist with his false prophet may wage war on the Church of God…”
 


Published on
00:00
00:00

%Where is the promise of His coming?

Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 
Towards the end of the Apostle Peter’s life, he forewarned us as to what would be the attitude of many in the last days concerning the apparent delay in Christ’s Second Coming, saying:
 
“knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts and saying, ‘Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.’” (2Peter 3:3-4)
 
Both Peter and Paul were shown the conditions which would later prevail in the last days (cf. 1Tim 4:1-3; 2Tim 3:1-5). The signs mentioned by them are characteristic of our times, more than any other generation before us – especially within the last few years. In this blog, I will be considering some of the arguments used by a rapidly growing number of people who often ridicule those of us who still eagerly await a future return of Christ.

“This generation will not pass”
 
Preterists present Jesus’ declaration in the Olivet Discourse, “this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place” as evidence that Christ returned in 70 AD, since Jesus describes both Israel’s desolation and His Second Coming in the same discourse.
 
However, a careful examination of the context within each of the three Synoptic Gospels makes it clear that there is a necessary separation between the 70 AD desolation of Jerusalem and Christ’s return.
 
Just prior to His discourse in Matthew 23:36 Jesus said to Israel’s representative leadership: “all these things will come upon this generation,” with “all these things” having reference to Israel’s judgment and desolation for rejecting the kingdom. Then in 38-39 He mentions His Second Coming as being subsequent to Israel’s desolation at such a time when they would be willing to receive Him as their Messiah and King. He said to them:
 
“See! Your house is left to you desolate; 39 for I say to you, you shall see Me no more UNTIL you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’” (Matt 23:38-39)
 
Preterists would say that God has permanently rejected Israel as a people. However, Jesus refers to their judgment as only being temporary, continuing until such a time when Israel will say, “blessed is He who ‘comes’ in the name of the Lord.” Luke’s Gospel, which gives the most detail concerning Israel’s 70AD judgment and desolation, also presents Israel’s judgment as only being temporary, saying:
 
“For there will be great distress in the land and wrath upon this people.  24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles UNTIL the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” (Luke 21:23-24)
 
Paul later received further revelation concerning Israel’s judgment and subsequent deliverance and restoration at Christ’s Second Coming. He said:
 
“For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel UNTIL the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: ‘The Deliverer will come out of Zion, and He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; 27 For this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.’” (Rom 11:25-27)
 
Paul here tells us that Israel’s judgment is temporary, lasting until the fulness of the Gentiles has come in. At that time, Israel will be saved and restored when Christ the Deliverer comes out of Zion, referring to Christ’s Second Coming. When Christ comes a second time it will not be for Israel’s destruction, as Preterists affirm, but for Israel’s deliverance. Sadly, many, including the Preterists, are ignorant concerning this mystery, believing that the Church has permanently replaced Israel as a people. I demonstrate the temporary nature of Israel’s judgment in my blog entitled: Has the Church Replaced Israel?
 
So, we see that there is a necessary separation between Israel’s desolation and dispersion and her deliverance at Christ’s Second Coming when a subsequent generation will say: “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!”
 
The Olivet Discourse has a Two-fold Fulfillment
 
After declaring Israel’s desolation and His subsequent coming at such a time when Israel would receive Him, Jesus continued saying in the next verse that not one stone of the temple would be left standing upon another. That was when His disciples asked Him the two-fold question: “Tell us, 1) when will these things be? And 2) what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” (Matt 24:3).
 
In the context, we have already seen that Jesus spoke of “these things” (Israel’s desolation and the destruction of their temple) which would come upon that very generation, and His subsequent coming again at such a time when Israel would gladly receive Him. The entire discourse is Jesus’ reply to their two-fold question. While there are many parallels between the two events, the careful reader will notice that they are clearly distinguishable.
 
In Luke’s account, the disciples are presented as only asking Jesus about Israel’s desolation which Jesus had just said would occur in that same generation (Luke 21:7), and he accordingly gives more details concerning Jerusalem’s desolation, whereas Matthew’s Gospel answers both questions,  while giving greater attention to the events surrounding the Second Coming of Christ.
 
For example, in Luke, Jesus told the Christians to flee Jerusalem as soon as they saw the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem, and he records Jesus’ announcement of God’s judgment against Israel which would occur at that time:
 
“But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.  21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter her.  22 For these are the days of vengeance… For there will be great distress in the land and wrath upon this people.  24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles UNTIL the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” (Luke 21:20-24)
 
As we see here, the surrounding of Jerusalem by the Roman armies is followed by the prolonged dispersion of the Jews and the Gentile occupation of Jerusalem. In contrast, in Matthew’s Gospel, we see more detail concerning the end of the age and events surrounding the Second Coming. In Matthew 24:14 Jesus said that the end of the age wouldn’t come until the gospel had been preached throughout the whole world. He said:
 
“And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world (οἰκουμένη) as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.” (Matt 24:14)
 
Clearly, this wasn’t fulfilled prior to 70AD.  To this day it still cannot be said that the entire inhabited world has heard the gospel. In the verses that immediately follow, we see another command to flee. However, in contrast to Luke’s account which commanded them to flee Jerusalem as soon as they saw the Roman armies surrounding the city, we see a command to flee Judea when the abomination of desolation is seen standing in the holy place:
 
“Therefore when you see the 'abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand), 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains… 21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be.  22 And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect's sake those days will be shortened.” (Matt 24:15-17; 21-22)
 
While the casual reader may assume that Jesus was referring to the same event in both Evangels, upon careful examination it becomes evident that in Matthew’s account Jesus was referring to His Second Coming when unprecedented events would become so severe as to destroy all flesh, requiring His intervention in order to save the remnant of His elect people. When He comes again, it will not be for Israel’s destruction, but for her deliverance. The prophet Daniel saw the same coming, and Christ is likewise seen in the book of Daniel to come for Israel’s deliverance after the same unprecedented Great Tribulation. Daniel said:
 
“At that time Michael shall stand up, the great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book. 2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life (eonian life), some to shame and everlasting contempt (eonian shame).” (Dan 12:1-2)
 
Jeremiah also refers to this same unprecedented tribulation as “the time of Jacob’s trouble,” and also says that Israel will be delivered at that time (Jer 30:7-9). Both Jesus and Daniel describe a physical resurrection when Israel is delivered at the close of the Great Tribulation (Matt 24:30-31). No physical resurrection occurred in 70AD, and Israel wasn’t delivered out of her tribulation by Christ’s Second Coming. Quite the contrary, she was left desolate and dispersed in judgment.
 
It is worthy of note that the Apostolic Fathers uniformly saw the abomination of desolation in Matthew 24 as being something yet in their future, followed by the visible return of Christ, whereas those Fathers who commented on Luke 21:20 saw the reference to the armies surrounding Jerusalem to have already occurred in 70AD. [1] Virtually no one in those days, whether secular or Christian, is on record as having understood Christ to have come at that time.
 
Timing of Jerusalem’s Destruction revealed – Timing of Second Coming concealed
 
The only sign given by Jesus to indicate that Israel’s desolation was imminent was that they would see the armies surrounding Jerusalem (Luke 21:20). Christians were commanded to flee Judea into the mountains at that time, and history records that they heeded His warning, fleeing to Pella before Jerusalem was completely surrounded.
 
In contrast to Israel’s desolation in 70AD, Jesus gave many signs which would indicate that His coming was imminent. One we have already considered was that the gospel will have been preached to all the nations of the world before the end comes and Christ returns.
 
Another sign we saw is that there would be “great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be” (Matt 24:21-22). The Roman siege of Jerusalem certainly was a time of tribulation for the Jews. According to Josephus, over a million Jews perished. However, the tribulation described by Jesus is on an unprecedented global scale. He said that there would never occur anything like it again. Yet the tribulation under the Nazi regime resulted in nearly six times more Jews being killed, without taking into account the millions of Jews who later died under Stalin’s regime. Jesus was clearly referring to the Great Tribulation of three and a half years, further described in Daniel and the book of Revelation where the number of fatalities is in the billions worldwide, rather than just a little over one million Jews in Jerusalem in 70AD. (Rev 6:8; 9:15).
 
Furthermore, Jesus said that when He returns, every eye from all the tribes of the earth will see Him coming (Rev 1:7; Matt 24:30; 2Thess 2:8; Rev 6:12-17).  At that time some will be sleeping in one part of the world, while others will be working in the fields in the daytime (Luke 17:34-36; Matt 24:40-41). The Lord will gather His elect throughout the earth at that time (Matt 24:30-31). Some will be taken, whereas others will be left.  Clearly, Jesus did not come in AD 70. Christ had simply left Jerusalem desolate due to their rejection of the kingdom (Matt 23:38-39). He did not come to personally destroy Jerusalem in 70 AD. When Christ returns, it will be to save them from their enemies – not to destroy them.
 
While Jesus was specific in indicating the timing of Israel’s desolation, He was emphatic in stating that the timing of His Second Coming was only known to the Father (Matt 24:36). Just before Christ ascended to the Father, the disciples persisted in asking Jesus when He would come and restore the kingdom to Israel. In response, Jesus not only said that it wasn’t for them to know “the day nor the hour” of His coming, but that it wasn’t even for them to know the times and seasons which the Father has determined by His own authority (Acts 1:7). Instead, Jesus told them in different words what He already told them in the Olivet Discourse: He told them that it was necessary for them to preach the gospel to all nations as a witness throughout the entire world before the end would come (Matt 24:13). After telling them that it wasn’t for them to know the times and seasons, He repeated their assignment, the Great Commission:
 
“It is not for you to know the times and seasons… But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” (Acts 1:7-8)
 
While the gospel was proclaimed in many of the nations surrounding Judah within that first generation, to this day it has yet to be proclaimed to all nations throughout the entire world.  
 
Two Distinct Generations
 
While I believe that, by divine intention, it is not readily apparent, Jesus spoke to two Distinct Generations in the Olivet Discourse. While He said concerning Israel’s desolation, “all these things will come upon this generation” (Matt 23:36), referring to those living at the time, He afterwards gave specific signs which would indicate that His return and the end were near. In that context, He addresses the very generation that will see the signs of His coming and the end of the age, saying:
 
“Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near.  33 So you also, when you see all these things, know that it is near — at the doors!   34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.” (Matt 24:32-34)
 
What were the signs He mentioned which would indicate that the end is near? In Matthew 24:7-8 He said that when nation rises against nation and kingdom against kingdom with famines and earthquakes in many places it would be just the beginning of the birth pains indicating that the end is drawing near.
 
After that, in verse 9-10, He said that we would then be hated by all nations and persecuted, and many would depart from the faith (cf. 2Thess 2:1-4). In 11-13, He warned that many false prophets would arise, deceiving many, and that wickedness would increase to such a degree that the love of most people would grow cold, but that those who endure to the end would be saved. Here I would point out that enduring to the end refers to enduring to the end when Christ returns, not enduring until Jerusalem is destroyed in 70AD. Then in verse 24, He said that there would be false signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.
 
In 15, He gives the sign of the abomination of desolation in the holy place in the temple court of Jerusalem, saying that those in Judea at that time must flee because it will mark the beginning of the Great Tribulation. The Apostolic Fathers unanimously believed that this was something yet to occur in their future. Irenaeus (160 – 230AD) said, years after the 70AD destruction of Herod’s Temple:
 
“But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom…and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance.” [2]
“And in the midst of the week,’ he says, ‘the sacrifice and the libation shall be taken away, and the abomination of desolation [shall be brought] into the temple: even unto the consummation of the time shall the desolation be complete.’ Now three years and six months constitute the half-week.” [3]
 
In the same manner as Futurists today, the Early Fathers believed, according to Scripture, that the temple in Jerusalem would be rebuilt and the abomination of desolation would be set up in a rebuilt temple, beginning the time of the Great Tribulation.
 
Finally, Jesus mentions the signs which will immediately accompany His coming:
 
“Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.  And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” (Matt 24:29-31)
 
It is in this context that Jesus says in verse 34, “this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.” “This generation” in the context, refers to the generation which shall see the beginning of the specific signs He mentioned being fulfilled. No one is recorded as having seen the Son of Man coming in 70AD, and much less do we see where all the tribes of the earth mourned upon having seen Him coming with power and great glory.
 

“Shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom
 
These words of Jesus are best understood in their context. Beginning in Matthew 16:28 and reading  through to 17:5 it says:

“Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. 17:1 Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James, and John his brother, led them up on a high mountain by themselves; and He was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and His clothes became as white as the light. And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him. Then Peter answered and said to Jesus, ‘Lord, it is good for us to be here; if You wish, let us make here three tabernacles: one for You, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.’ While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them; and suddenly a voice came out of the cloud, saying, ‘This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!’” (Matt 16:28-17:5)
 
Preterists often cite Matthew 16:28 as evidence that Christ had to have come a second time and established His kingdom on earth in 70AD while many of the disciples were still alive. However, when one reads the following verses, it becomes evident that the coming in His kingdom He was referring to occurred only six days after when Christ was transfigured before Peter, James and John, giving them a preview of His coming kingdom. Peter himself made reference to this as being a foretaste of the coming of Christ in His kingdom. He said of his mountaintop encounter with the glorified Christ:
 
“For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty. 17 For He received from God the Father honor and glory when such a voice came to Him from the Excellent Glory: ‘This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.’ 18 And we heard this voice which came from heaven when we were with Him on the holy mountain.” (2Peter 1:16-18)
 
Peter clearly understood the declaration of Jesus, “there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom” as having been fulfilled when they saw Him transfigured on the mount with Moses and Elijah.
 
Apparent Delay Implied in the Parables
 

Jesus told His disciples in Matthew 24;44 to live in a state of expectancy, saying to them, “the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect, while at the same time implying in parables that He would not come within the timeframe anticipated by His followers. 

 
In the parable of the faithful and the evil servant, Jesus said that the evil servant said in his heart, My master is delaying his coming, and instead of being occupied in his master’s business, he began to live according to his own fleshly desires (Matt 24:48-51). In the parable of the ten virgins, the bridegroom was delayed” – so much so, that even the five wise virgins slumbered and had to be awakened to receive the bridegroom (Matt 25:5). In the parable of the talents, He compared His coming to “a man traveling to a far country,” not returning until after a long time (Matt 25:14,18).
 
It is clear that Jesus wanted His disciples to live in anticipation of His soon return, diligently laboring to fulfill the Great Commission with the expectation that He could return within their own lifetime, while at the same time indirectly indicating through His parables that His return would be much farther in the future than they anticipated. He concluded His parables with a call to be watchful which not only applied to His disciples, but also to future generations until He comes. He said: “And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch!” (Mark 13:37).
 
His House must be Filled
 
To Paul, it was revealed that during the present time, blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. At that time, Christ the Deliverer will come out of Zion and all Israel will be saved (Rom 11:25-26).
 
Here we see that Christ will not come again until the gospel has been proclaimed to all nations and the fullness of the Gentiles has come into the fold. As soon as the last of God’s elect firstfruits from among the Gentiles has come into the fold, Christ will return, and all Israel will be saved when they look upon Him whom they pierced (Zech 12:10). At that time, the nation of Israel will be reborn in a day (Isa 66:8-10).
 
In the parable of the great supper, Jesus also implied that He wouldn’t return until the fullness of the Gentiles had come in. In this parable, the master had planned a great banquet for his invited guests, representing the nation of Israel. However, Israel rejected the invitation. The master became angry and told his servant to go to the poor and the maimed and the lame and the blind, referring to the Samaritans who were held in contempt by the Jews. After having invited them, the servant said that there were still many empty seats. At this point in the parable, Jesus made reference to the Gentiles when He said in continuation:
 
“Then the master said to the servant, 'Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled. For I say to you that none of those men who were invited shall taste my supper.” (Luke 14:23-24)
 
This parable of the master’s house being filled with those from the highways and hedges, referring to the Gentiles, rather than the Jews who were initially invited, is parallel with what Paul saw concerning the fullness of the Gentiles. God is holding off the feast until His house is filled. As soon as the fullness of the Gentiles has come in and His house has been filled, Christ will come.
 
This is the primary reason given by Peter for the seeming delay in Christ’s coming. After saying that in the last days we would be mocked for still awaiting Christ’s return, Peter explained:
 
“But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9 The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering TOWARD US, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.” (2 Peter 3:8-9)
 
Here we see that, in spite of how we may perceive it, the Lord hasn’t delayed His coming. Since He inhabits eternity, “shortly” does not mean the same to Him as it does to us. He then explains why He hasn’t come yet. He is longsuffering toward us, patiently waiting until all of us, as His elect firstfruits, have come to repentance. In other words, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in and His house is full.
 
“The time is near… I am coming quickly”
 
In the book of Revelation Jesus begins by saying, the time is near,” and three times He repeats the phrase I am coming quickly (Rev 1:3; 3:11; 22:7,12).  Many are scandalized by the fact that nearly 1900 years have passed since Jesus made these declarations. Preterists attempt to demonstrate that the book of Revelation was written before 66AD, instead of the generally accepted date of 96AD, in order to argue that Christ meant to say that He was coming in 70AD. I present the arguments against the early dating of Revelation in my blogs: “The Objective Evidences for a Late Dating of John’s Revelation” and “The Interpretive Arguments for an Early Dating of John’s Revelation.
 
In my book, “Last Days – Past or Present?” I demonstrate in more detail why Christ’s coming is yet future. But without going into further detail here, it should be evident to any unbiased student of the Scriptures and history, that no past event can reasonably be argued to have been the Second Coming of Christ in power and great glory to receive His own and to reign upon the earth.
 
The admonitions to be watchful because the time is near must be understood in the light of the abundance of Scriptures which clearly imply a delay. The gospel must be preached to all nations and the fullness of the Gentiles must come in, filling His house. Only the Lord knows when that will have come to pass.
 
Also, as Peter explained, we must take into account the relative nature of time. Our sense of time is not the same as the Lord’s. For Him, one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day. The same is true of a child’s sense of time in comparison to that of an elderly person. When my children were little, we often went on long trips, even driving from California to Guatemala a couple of times. As an adult who had made the trip before, I knew how long it would take, and to me it seemed like a much shorter trip than it did to my 4-year-old son Cristian. After about an hour, he was already complaining, asking why it was taking so long. It wouldn’t have been of any use trying to explain to him every highway we would have to take, since he wasn’t old enough to understand. I started out by telling him that we would be arriving soon, and tried to keep him occupied with other things so he wouldn’t think about how long it was taking. Then when that failed, I would tell him something like, “when you see the big bridge, we are getting closer,” or, “when you see the ocean, it will be just a bit further.” My wife and I knew from the beginning how long it would take to reach our destination, but it was no use trying to explain to him how long the trip would last, since he wouldn’t have understood. And even if he could have comprehended the time required, it would have only made the trip more unbearable for him.
 
I believe that, in a similar manner, the Lord told His disciples that it wasn’t for them to know the times and the seasons, but rather that they were to busy themselves in proclaiming the gospel throughout the earth while at the same time being watchful for the signs which would indicate that His coming was at the door. May He find us occupied doing what He commissioned us to do when He comes.
 
“Therefore you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his master made ruler over his household, to give them food in due season?  Blessed is that servant whom his master, when he comes, will find so doing.” (Matt 24:44-46)
 


[1] Hyppolytus (AD 170 to 236),Treatise on the Antichrist, Sections 47-67
These things, then, will come to pass, beloved, and the one week being divided into two parts, and the abomination of desolation being manifested then, and the two prophets and forerunners of the Lord having finished their course, and the whole world finally approaching the consummation, what remains but the coming of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ from heaven, for whom we have looked in hope?
 
Tertullian (AD 160-220), Luke 21:1-38
“Then, having shown what was to be the period of the destruction, even ‘when Jerusalem should begin to be compassed with armies,’  He described the signs of the end of all things: ‘portents in the sun, and the moon, and the stars, and upon the earth distress of nations in perplexity – like the sea roaring – by reason of their expectation of the evils which are coming on the earth." 
 

[2] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 30 section 4
 

[3] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1, Irenaeus: Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 25 section 3,4
 
Published on
Image description
 
by George Sidney Hurd
 
The wrath of God is without a doubt the most misunderstood of all divine attributes. Those of the Augustinian persuasion often present God’s wrath in a manner inconsistent with His essential nature, which is love (1Jn 4:8,16). On the other hand, Progressive Christians tend to redefine His wrath in such a manner as to exclude all anger – even in the face of great evil and injustice.
 
Since those that hold to the doctrine of eternal torment believe that those consigned to the Lake of Fire will forever be the subjects of God’s unmitigated wrath without any redemptive purpose, they must present God’s nature as being divided. They must say that, while God is love, He is at the same time wrath, and that this love/wrath duality in the divine nature will endure throughout all eternity. Rather than God’s wrath against wickedness resulting in just judgments and corrective punishments with a view to the restoration of the objects of His love, they must present God’s love and mercy as forever ending in a heartbeat for the majority of mankind for whom Christ died. Some Calvinists, and even Martin Luther himself, 
have actually  taught that God’s essential nature is divided, and that all things occur according to His either having eternally loved or eternally hated individuals. Luther said:
 
“The love and hate of God towards men are immutable and eternal, existing, not merely before there was any merit or work of ‘free-will,’ but before the world was made; [so] all things take place in us of necessity, according as He has from eternity loved or not loved... Faith and unbelief come to us by no work of our own, but through the love and hatred of God” [1]
 
However, the Scriptures indicate that it is God’s love and mercy that is eternal and never comes to an end, not His hatred and wrath:
 
Love never ends…” (1Cor 13:8 ESV)
 
“Oh, give thanks to the Lord, for He is good!
For His mercy endures forever.” (1Chron 16:34, cf. Psa 118, etc.)
 
 “For the Lord will not cast off forever. 32 Though He causes grief, yet He will show compassion according to the multitude of His mercies. 33 For He does not afflict willingly, nor grieve the children of men.” (Lam 3:31-33)
 
“For I will not contend forever, nor will I always be angry; For the spirit would fail before Me, and the souls which I have made.” (Isa 57:16)
 
Have you ever heard someone speak of God’s “eternal wrath?” Did you know that such a concept never appears in the Bible? On the contrary, it is His love and mercy which are unending, not His wrath. God here says that He will not always be angry, lest the spirit and souls of those whom He made should fail before Him. It is inconceivable that a loving omniscient God would bring souls into existence, knowing from the very beginning that they would become the objects of His unending vindictive wrath – It is impossible that an all-wise benevolent Creator should create beings, knowing from the  very beginning that He would be angry with them forever!
 
Rightly understood, wrath is a temporal contingent attribute of God’s essential nature, which is love. That is why, in His wrath He remembers mercy (Hab 3:2). Once Christ has subdued all His enemies and every knee has bowed, and every tongue confessed Him as Lord, there will be no more sin or lawlessness in all of God’s new creation. At that time, God will be all in all, and there will no longer exist an environment which would give occasion to His wrath (Php 2:10-11; 1Cor 15:28).
 
At the other end of the pendulum, while Progressive Christians often rightly point out that the wrath of God is a contingent attribute of His essential nature which is love, they often present His love as if it were a form of all-affirming permissiveness which disallows any anger for sin or punishment of evildoers, as we normally understand the word wrath. In order to do this, they must ignore the obvious meaning of the words for wrath as used in Scripture and seek to redefine wrath in a manner that excludes any real anger on God’s part. The following quote from Steve McVey illustrates this tendency, saying:
 
“We think of wrath in a human sense of some sort of retributive anger that is being poured out on somebody for something wrong that they have done. But the word doesn’t mean that at all when it comes to the wrath of God. One of the words for wrath in the original language of Scripture is the word orgē, and the word orgē is the same word from which we get the word orgy or orgasm. And the word doesn’t have to mean anger, the word can also mean an intense passion. In fact, the etymology of the word is that it means reaching out and grasping with a quivering hand – that kind of intensity. So, when we talk about the wrath of God, there are words that can be translated as anger, but when we talk about the wrath of God, if we have the idea that God is a punitive, judicial deity who is there to punish us for wrongdoing, then when we come across the word wrath, obviously we’re going to think that it refers to some sort of anger. But if we have this underlying belief that God is pure love, and He is, and that God is good, then when we come to the word wrath, we’ll understand that there is another way to see that word. It’s not changing the Scriptures, it’s just looking at the word in a historical sense in which we see it not as anger but as a passionate love for us that will stop at nothing to win us over.” [2] 
 
As another Progressive author puts it: “I prefer to say that God loves with such intensity that it is wrath to those who are fighting against it.” So, instead of God actually being angered by our sin and rebellion, they depict Him as being more like an all-consenting parent that smothers their unwilling adolescent child with hugs and kisses, rather than showing anger and administering corrective discipline, as we would normally do as loving parents.  
 
The etymology of a word, in and of itself, is not that which determines its actual meaning. Rather than contriving a definition from a derivative of one of the several words used in Scripture for wrath, one must determine a word’s meaning primarily by examining the contexts in which the word is used. While undeniably God’s wrath is ultimately rooted in His love, it is certainly not something comparable to a father’s embrace. When Paul says that Jesus delivers us from the coming wrath, he clearly does not mean to say that He delivers us from the Father’s loving embrace!
 
Contrary to what Steve McVey says, the historical sense of orge is not passionate love. The actual meaning of orge in the secular literature of that day is set forth in Kittle’s 10 volume lexicon. It states:
 
“In secular literature orge takes on the sense of anger as the most striking manifestation of powerful inner passion, thumos.  ‘orge…becomes in the political life of the following period the characteristic and legitimate attitude of the ruler who has to avenge injustice.’ ‘orge relates, not to the verdict (Aristot. Rhet., I, 1, p. 1354 a, 16 ff.) but only to the sentence. In virtue of this orge itself acquired the meaning of ‘punishment.’ Apart from the moral wrath which protects against evil and which is sometimes expressly called dikaia orge (righteous indignation) (Demosth. Or., 16, 19; Dio C., 40, 51, 2; Ditt. Syll.3, 780, 22), orge in Gk. came under a predominantly negative judgment.” [3]
 
So, it is not true that the word orge in the culture of that time expressed a non-punitive passionate love. Looking at the passages in Scripture where God’s wrath is mentioned, we see that the meaning is essentially the same throughout as in the secular literature of that time. The short-term results of His wrath are seen to be just but clearly negative, often resulting in lives being cut short in judgment (Ex 15:5; 22:24; Num 11:33; Deut 29:23-28; Isa 13:9; Ezek 21:31; Nah 1:2-3,5, etc.).
 
Seeing that God’s wrath in Scripture clearly results in punitive action and often even death, Progressives reject those Scriptures which portray God as actively punishing the wicked in His wrath, saying that, in those instances, the human authors projected their own erroneous concepts of pagan deities upon God.
 
They correctly say that Jesus is the lens through which we must see Scripture. However, the Jesus they use as a lens is an edited version of the actual Jesus of the Bible. According to them, any portrayal of God in Scripture which they deem to be non-Christlike, or more specifically, any that does not present God in a passive, nonviolent cruciform manner, is to be rejected. However, there are many problems with using this approach to Scripture.
 
In the first place, Jesus Himself said that the Scriptures are the word of God which came through the human authors, and for that reason they cannot be broken (Jn 10:35). He said that God’s word as such is truth, and that not one jot nor tittle can pass from it without being fulfilled (Jn 17:17, cf. Psa 119:160; Matt 5:18). Paul further said of the Holy Scriptures that every part of them was breathed out from God (2Tim 3:15-16). I consider this subject in more detail in my four-part series of blogs on inerrancy.
 
In the second place, Jesus Himself is presented in Scripture as coming a second time in wrath to execute justice and deliver His people:
 
“And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! 17 For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?” (Rev 6:15-17)
 
“Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” (Rev 19:15)
 
Here in the book of Revelation, Christ Himself is seen to be executing wrath against the nations when He comes again to reign. The reference to “the great day of His wrath” alludes to the day of eschatological wrath, or the “day of the Lord” prophesied in numerous Old Testament passages: 
 
“Behold, the day of the Lord comes, cruel, with both wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate; and He will destroy its sinners from it. Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth will move out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts and in the day of His fierce anger.” (Isa 13:9,13; cf. Zeph 1:14-18; Joel 3:12-16; etc.)
 
How do Progressives get around these passages which undeniably present Christ as acting in a non-cruciform manner against the wicked among the nations when He returns? Some seek to eliminate the book of Revelation from the Bible altogether. Those who accept Revelation as canonical apply a spiritual/allegorical meaning according to their own particular theological persuasion. Preterists try to argue that these references to Christ’s wrath speaks of the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem. However, the judgment of His Second Coming described here is said to be “against the nations” and “the kings of the earth,” not against the nation of Israel. When Christ comes a second time, it will be to deliver Israel, not to destroy her (Rom 11:25-29). I find it inconsistent that many Preterists who deny that God’s wrath is in any way punitive, have no problem viewing the Jews as having been the recipients of God’s punitive wrath in 70AD.
 
Finally, Jesus affirmed God’s acts of judgment in wrath in the Old Testament and He warns of the eschatological wrath yet to come. In Deuteronomy 29:23 it says that the Lord overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah “in His anger and His wrath.” Jesus not only affirmed that God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, but He also compared His Second Coming to Sodom’s sudden destruction in the days of Lot (Luke 17:28-30). And while we see in Ezekiel 16 that God will finally restore those destroyed in Sodom (Ezek 16:53-55 NIV), Jesus indicated that they will still nevertheless have to give an account in the day of judgment (Mark 6:11).
 
Therefore, using Jesus as He is presented to us in the Bible as the lens by which to see Scripture, doesn’t enable one to remove from Scripture those passages which speak of the wrath of God. In fact, Jesus doesn’t allow us to remove even one jot or tittle from the Law and the prophets (Matt 5:17-18; Luke 24:44).
 
Paul and the Wrath of God
 
In spite of the fact that Paul is known as the Apostle of grace, he had more to say about the wrath of God than any other New Testament author. He spoke of both God’s wrath against wickedness in the present, and also the eschatological wrath which is being reserved for the judgment of the “day of wrath.”
 
Present Wrath
 
“The wrath of God is being revealed (present tense) from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness.” (Rom 1:18 NIV)
 
“But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust who inflicts wrath (orge)? (I speak as a man.) 6 Certainly not! For then how will God judge the world?” (Rom 3:5-6)
 
While God, in His patience, is holding off His just judgment against the unrepentant, giving them space to repent, He is angered by the wickedness and injustices being committed by mankind. Psalms 7:11 says, “God is a just judge, and God is angry with the wicked every day.”  Paul indicates that, to a degree, the wrath of God is presently being revealed against the ungodly.
 
In what manner can God be said to be presently inflicting wrath? We can see God’s intervention throughout history, bringing judgments against the obstinately unrepentant. Some notable examples are the flood in the days of Noah and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. In the New Testament we see the judgment against Ananias and Sapphira when they were struck dead for lying to the Holy Spirit and against Herod for accepting worship as a god (Acts 5:1-11; 12:22-23).
 
We can also see from history that God’s judgments have come against nations who turn from Him, practicing wickedness and persecuting His people. The Psalmist said: “The wicked shall be turned into Sheol, and all the nations that forget God” (Ps 9:17; cf. Isa 41:11-13). The same fate that befell the Roman Empire and the Soviet Union will inevitably come upon the United States, or any other nation, if they turn from God and practice wickedness.
 
On an individual level, we see that the wrath of God is often executed indirectly through the ruling authorities. Paul explains:
 
“Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. 4 For he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger (ἔκδικος, ‘an executor of justice’) to execute wrath on him who practices evil. 5 Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience' sake.” (Rom 13:3-6)
 
So, we see that God’s wrath or punishment is often indirectly carried out through His ministers, the established authorities.
 
Also, wrath, in the sense of punishment or negative consequences, is experienced in this life by those who persist in a life of fleshly indulgence. Paul speaks of God’s wrath in this sense saying:
 
“Therefore put to death your members which are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. 6 Because of these things the wrath of God is coming upon the sons of disobedience.” (Col 3:5-6)
 
“For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. 7 Therefore do not be partakers with them.” (Eph 5:5-7)
 
The sinful lifestyles Paul here mentions have negative consequences, not only in the future for the unrepentant by not being granted entrance into the kingdom, but also in the present, negatively affecting one’s spiritual, emotional and physical wellbeing, often even resulting in premature death. God will not be mocked: whatever a man sows, sooner or later he will reap (Gal 6:7-8).
 
Future Wrath
 
Paul, after saying that one can despise the goodness of God by failing to see that His patience and goodness are intended to lead one to repentance, warns that those who obstinately remain unrepentant are storing up wrath for the day of wrath. He said:
 
“Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance? 5 But in accordance with your hardness and your impenitent heart you are treasuring up for yourself wrath in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, 6 who will render to each one according to his deeds.” (Rom 2:4-6)
 
The day of the Great White Throne Judgment is here referred to as the day of wrath because at that time just and measured punishments will be determined for the unrepentant. Those whose names are not found written in the book of life on that day will be judged according to their deeds, receiving their part in the Lake of Fire, being hurt by the second death (Rev 20:11-15; 2:11).
 
It must be kept in mind that even God’s wrath is paternal and rooted in His essential nature which is love. That being so, in His wrath He remembers mercy, and even His most severe judgments in wrath are corrective in nature, ending in restoration. This can be seen in His dealings with His people Israel in wrath when they persist in their evil ways. Note the language of fire and wrath which God uses against Israel:
 
“The word of the Lord came to me, saying, 18 ‘Son of man, the house of Israel has become dross to Me; they are all bronze, tin, iron, and lead, in the midst of a furnace; they have become dross from silver. 19 Therefore thus says the Lord God: ‘Because you have all become dross, therefore behold, I will gather you into the midst of Jerusalem. 20 As men gather silver, bronze, iron, lead, and tin into the midst of a furnace, to blow fire on it, to melt it; so I will gather you in My anger and in My fury, and I will leave you there and melt you. 21 Yes, I will gather you and blow on you with the fire of My wrath, and you shall be melted in its midst. 22 As silver is melted in the midst of a furnace, so shall you be melted in its midst; then you shall know that I, the Lord, have poured out My fury on you… Therefore I have poured out My indignation on them; I have consumed them with the fire of My wrath; and I have recompensed their deeds on their own heads,’ says the Lord God.” (Ezek 22:17-23,31)
 
Here we see that God’s wrath against His beloved Israel is in the form of the purifying fires of affliction. God sets Himself against His people and throws them into the fire as silver, bronze or lead.  But the furnace of fire is in order to separate the dross or scum from their lives. The end result is that they come forth from the furnace pure and separate from sin. Just as is the case with a loving father disciplining his son, His wrath is actually His love acting against the sin in their lives. The end result is the peaceable fruit of righteousness, as we can see further along in Ezekiel 36:24-26:
 
“For I will take you from among the nations, gather you out of all countries, and bring you into your own land. 25 Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. 26 I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.”
 
The end result of God’s wrath against Israel is that they become cleansed of all their filthiness and are given a new heart. The same could be said concerning His affliction of any of the children of men whom He has created. He does not willingly afflict nor grieve the children of men. What He does, He does only for their own benefit and the greater good. Therefore, we can see that God’s wrath, correctly understood, refers to His corrective punishment of His wayward, rebellious children, and is in no way incompatible with love.
 
Jesus delivers us from the Wrath to Come
 
“and to wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, even Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come.” (1Thess 1:10)
 
For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.” (1Thess 5:9)
 
“Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him.” (Rom 5:9)
 
When we believe the gospel of salvation by grace, we are justified or declared righteous before God (Rom 5:1). As justified saints in Christ, there is now no condemnation (Rom 8:1). Having been justified through faith in Christ’s redemption from our sins by His blood, we have once-and-for-all been delivered from the wrath to come (Heb 9:12).
 
That is not to say that God isn’t angered, relationally speaking, when we as believers willfully sin, just as any good father would be angered by the willful disobedience of his children. Paul said that when we fail to judge sin in our own lives, God must intervene in judgment, at times even cutting our lives short, in order that we should not be condemned with the world (1Cor 11:30-32; 1Jn 5:16-17). Paul warns believers who would live in sexual immorality saying:
 
“For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you should abstain from sexual immorality; 4 that each of you should know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor, 5 not in passion of lust, like the Gentiles who do not know God; 6 that no one should take advantage of and defraud his brother in this matter, because the Lord is the avenger of all such, as we also forewarned you and testified.” (1Thess 4:3-6)
 
Also, in Romans 13 Paul is warning believers, rather than nonbelievers, against disobeying the civil authorities when he says:
 
“For he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. 5 Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience' sake.” (Rom 13:4-5)
 
The Law brings about Wrath
 
“because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression.” (Rom 4:15)
 
Paul says that the Law brings about wrath. Here orge is used primarily in the sense of penalty, rather than the emotion of anger, much as the wrath we experience from the civil authorities speaks of the penalty for the infraction, rather than those in authority literally becoming angry with the offender. If there is no 25-mile speed limit sign, you will not be penalized for going 35 miles per hour. But once the law is established, there will be a penalty and speeders will experience the wrath of the law.
 
It is the same with the Law God gave to the children of Israel. Once the Law was enacted, they began to experience the wrath or penalty for breaking it. It is significant that God is never seen to have shown wrath towards His people until Sinai. The wrath of God isn’t even mentioned in the Bible until we get to Exodus. But after the Law was given, His wrath is referred to either directly or indirectly nearly 500 times, and most often it is seen to be directed towards His own covenant people for having broken the Law.
 
There is a marked contrast between the Old Covenant of the Law and the New Covenant of grace. When the Law was inaugurated at Sinai, 3,000 people died in one day. In contrast, when the New Covenant was inaugurated on the day of Pentecost, 3,000 people were saved in one day. Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, becoming a curse for us (Gal 3:10-14). While God may be angered by sin and rebellion in the lives of His children, resulting in discipline, as reborn sons we have been delivered from the Law with it’s resulting wrath and condemnation, and we now serve in the newness of the Spirit, not in the oldness of the letter of the Law (Rom 7:6; Gal 3:24-26).
 
Conclusion
 
In conclusion, I believe that an unbiased understanding of the entirety of the revelation of Scripture concerning the wrath of God disallows both the extreme of the Traditional Augustinian doctrine of “eternal wrath,” and also the Progressive’s attempt to so redefine the word wrath so as to deny that it involves any indignation against the evil and injustice of the wicked, claiming that His wrath is not a punishing wrath, but simply an intense emotion of love.
 
While God loves us with a love that never ends and therefore will not always be angry, His wrath against all ungodliness and wickedness of evil men is real and brings negative consequences. Understanding this to be so, I believe that it is actually unloving on our part to tell the unrepentant sinner that God’s wrath is nothing more than His passionate love for them.
 
Although there is an element of truth to that statement, it is deceptive, since it fails to warn them that as long as they continue in their unrepentant state, they are storing up wrath for the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to each one according to their deeds (Rom 2:4-6). Rather than giving the unrepentant a false assurance, we need to speak the truth in love so that they will repent. As James says, “he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins” (James 5:20; cf. Luke 3:7-9).
 


[1] Martin Luther:  The Bondage of the Will, pp. 226, 228-229.
 

[2] Steve McVey, Love Unrelenting, youtube,1:05min.
 

[3] Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Copyright © 1972-1989 By Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., NT:3709
Published on
Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 
At the Last Supper on the eve of His passion, Jesus said to the Father in His intercessory prayer: “this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent” (Jn 17:3). Unitarians, including the Jehovah Witnesses and followers of A. E. Knoch, present Jesus’ statement here as conclusive evidence that Jesus Christ was not God. Some even go so far as to say that if you honor the Son just as you honor the Father, you are guilty of blasphemy and will not inherit eternal life (eonian life).
 
But did Jesus intend for us to understand His reference to the Father as the only true God in a manner that would exclude the divinity of the Son, or was He only excluding all so-called gods, except for the true God, which also comprises the Son and Holy Spirit, as Trinitarians affirm? Does this one statement somehow negate all that we have seen in the previous blogs concerning Christ’s eternal preexistence? The purpose of this blog is to demonstrate that Jesus’ words here actually dovetail with all the other affirmations of Christ’s deity in Scripture, rather than contradicting them.
 
If indeed the Father is the only true God in a Unitarian sense, to the exclusion of the Son and the Holy Spirit, then we have an obvious contradiction, since both the Son and the Spirit are called God throughout Scripture (Jn 1:1; 1:18 NET; 5:18; 20:28-29; Phil 2:5-6; 2Pet 1:1; Acts 5:3-4). If the Father is the only true God in a Unitarian sense, it would logically lead us to conclude that the Son is a false god, being that He is also called God.
 
1 John 5:20 “Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.”
 
Only in the Trinitarian sense can Jesus be God at the same time that the Father is the only true God, since the Triune God includes the Son. For this reason, John had no problem with also calling Jesus “the true God” in 1John 5:20. He said:
 
“And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This (οὗτος) is the true God and eternal life.” (1Jn 5:20)
 
Here we see the very same title “the true God” which Jesus Himself applied to the Father in John 17:3 applied to Himself as the Son. Since there cannot be two true Gods while at the same time being only one true God, both the Father and the Son must make up that one and only true Godhead, just as Trinitarians have always believed. It cannot be argued that the pronoun “this” is referring to the Father here, since “this” is the near demonstrative pronoun οὗτος. If John had wanted to refer back to the Father, he would have used the far demonstrative pronoun ἐκεῖνος, which would read “that one” in English.
 
Additionally, Jesus Christ is here declared to be “the true God and eternal life.”  It is Jesus, rather than the Father, who John repeatedly refers to as “the life” and “eternal life” (Jn 1:4; 5:26,40; 10:10; 11:25; 14:6; 20:31; 1Jn 1:2; 5:12). In fact, 1John begins and closes identifying Jesus Christ as “eternal life” in distinction from the Father. The epistle begins saying of Christ the eternal Word:
 
“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life —  2 the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us.” (1 Jn 1:1-2)
 
So, we see here that the Son, the true God, also called “eternal life,” was with the Father from the beginning before being manifested in the flesh as Jesus, the Christ. This is in agreement with John 1:1 which says that “In the beginning was the Word and the word was with God and the Word was God.” The only way the Father and the Son can both be the only true God is if indeed what Jesus said concerning His relationship with the Father is literally true when He said: I and My Father are one” (Jn 10:30), and “The Father is in Me and I in Him” (Jn 10:38), or “He that has seen Me has seen the Father” (Jn 14:9). When Jesus said that He and the Father were one, the Jews understood and attempted to stone Him for blasphemy, saying to Him: You, being a Man, make Yourself God” (Jn 10:33). Apparently, the Jews had a better understanding of who Jesus was claiming to be than the Unitarians do today.
 
Unitarians typically argue that the Son is only one with the Father in the sense of being united in mind and purpose. In order to argue this, they point out that, later in Jesus’ intercessory prayer, He prayed to the Father asking Him “that they may be one just as We are one” (Jn 17:22). However, what Jesus was asking for was not merely that we be one in mind and purpose with them, but rather, He was speaking of a real vital union with God through the Son in which He would become our very life in union with Him through the new birth (Rom 8:10 NASB; Gal 2:20; Col 3:4).
 
Jesus, speaking of the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost said: At that day you will know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you” (Jn 14:20). Jesus wasn’t simply saying: “In that day you will know that we are of one mind.” He was speaking of believers being immersed into the Body of Christ by the Holy Spirit (1Cor 12:13). We actually become partakers of the divine nature, becoming one with the Lord through the regeneration of the Holy Spirit (2Pet 1:4).[1] Paul said of born-again believers: “But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him” (1 Cor 6:17). This is not merely referring to being of the same mind as the Lord, although we do have the mind of Christ. It speaks of a vital union with God that the natural mind cannot receive nor comprehend, just as they cannot comprehend the vital union which exists between the persons of the Trinity, in spite of the fact that it is clearly taught in Scripture. The God of the Bible is one, but it is a complex unity, comprised of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I demonstrate this with more detail in my blog: The Triunity of God.
 
Also, to argue that the Son is excluded from being the true God because Jesus called the Father “the true God,” would conversely obligate Unitarians to deny that the Father is the true light since it is only the Son who is called the true Light” (Jn 1:9).
 
Jude, the half-brother of Jesus, also refers to Jesus Christ as our only Master and Lord (Jude 4). Who would deny that the Father is also our Master and Lord? Jesus said that no one is good except God alone (Mk 10:18). Does that mean that the Son is not good? Certainly not! As Jesus said: “He who has seen Me has seen the Father” (Jn 14:9).
 
The only way in which the Father and the Son can both be the only true God, the only Master and Lord, and the only true Light is if the Father and the Son are truly one, just as Jesus declared, thereby provoking the Jews to take up stones to stone Him for claiming equality with God (Jn 10:30,33).
 
Why then would Jesus refer to the Father as the only true God? Why does John also refer to Jesus as the true God? The obvious reason is because there were many false gods in that culture. The very next phrase which follows in 1John 5 explains why. Immediately after saying: “This is the true God and eternal life,” John follows up by saying: “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1Jn 5:21). While the synoptic gospels were written to monotheistic Jews, John primarily wrote to Gentile believers in the pagan society of the Roman Empire with its panoply of gods, including Caesar. For that reason, he emphasized that there is only one true God, telling them to avoid worshipping other false gods.
 
1Corinthians 8:4-6 “For us there is one God, the Father…and one Lord Jesus Christ”
 
In light of all the idolatry in Corinth, Paul likewise emphasized that, although there are many “so-called gods,” for us there is only one true God. He said:
 
“For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as there are many gods and many lords), 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live.” (1 Cor 8:5-6)
 
Again, if “one God” is understood in the Unitarian sense, excluding the Son, rather than God being one in a Triune sense, that would make the Son out to be a false or “so-called” god, rather than the true God, since He is called God several times in Scripture.
 
Also, if there is only one Lord, it would exclude the Father from being Lord, yet the Father is commonly referred to as Lord in Scripture (Matt 11:25; Lu 1:32, etc.). We even see the Father as Lord, speaking to the Son as Lord in Acts 2:34, where it says: “The Lord  said to my Lord, ‘Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.’” Here we either have two Lords, contrary to what Paul said, or else the Father and the Son are truly one, just as Jesus said they were (cf. Matt 22:42-45). Additionally, if the Lord Jesus were the only Lord, it would exclude the Holy Spirit from being Lord, yet He is also called Lord (2Cor 3:17).
 
In conclusion, while these statements emphasize that there is only one true God, when the totality of Scripture is taken together as a harmonious whole, it actually confirms the Triune nature of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, in a complex unity, rather than presenting God as having a simple solitary existence. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are always seen together from the very moment of creation. All created things are of the Father and through the Son, and they took form as the Holy Spirit moved (1 Cor 8: 6; Gen 1:1-2).
 
Contrary to the claim of some Unitarians who say that we blaspheme when we worship Jesus Christ as Lord and God, as Thomas did, Jesus warns those who would diminish Him as the Son of God, saying that “all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him” (Jn 5:23). John takes it a step further saying to those early Gnostics who denied that Jesus Christ was God in the flesh, saying: “Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also” (1Jn 2:23).
 
You ask why it is so important? It is important because there cannot be any other Savior apart from Yahweh Elohim Himself. The blood of Christ shed upon the cross was not just the blood of a good man, it was the very blood of God. As Paul said:
 
“Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.” (Acts 20:28)
 


[1] Wuest’s Word Studies, 2 Peter 1:4: “Through these promises, the saints have become partakers of, sharers in the divine nature. Peter is here referring to regeneration as in 1 Peter 1:23. This divine nature implanted in the inner being of the believing sinner, becomes the source of his new life and actions. By its energy in giving him both the desire and the power to do God's will, he has escaped the corruption that is in the world.”
 
Published on
Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 
Having established from Scripture in the previous blog that the Son of God has eternally existed, being Yahweh the Almighty I AM, without beginning of days, nor end of life, we can now direct our attention to the proof-texts presented by those who seek to deny His eternal preexistence. Since the Christadelphians, who deny that the Son preexisted His incarnation, interpret most of these texts differently than the Jehovah Witnesses and the followers of A. E. Knoch, I will be considering their distinct interpretations side by side.
 
Revelation 3:14 “The beginning of the creation of God”
 
“And to the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write, ‘These things says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God (η αρχη της κτισεως του θεου).’” (Rev 3:14)
 
All three groups have their own unique way of translating the phrase, “the Beginning of the creation of God (η αρχη της κτισεως του θεου).”
 
The Jehovah Witnesses, in their New World Translation, correctly render the first genitive in the phrase as, “of the creation,” but then proceed to render the second genitive of God (του θεου)” as, by God,” in order to make Jesus out to be saying that He was created by God. However, the noun του θεου is in the genitive form, not the instrumental, and therefore the phrase should be translated “of the creation of God.”
 
A. E. Knoch renders η αρχη της κτισεως του θεου as “God’s Creative Original.” Without wanting to be facetious, I must say that it is his paraphrase which is a creative original, rather than it being a literal translation. This rendering aligns with his belief that the Son of God is merely a unique creature, being the first and most sublime of all God’s creatures.
 
The Christadelphians cannot say that the Son was literally the first created being, since they believe that He didn’t even exist prior to being conceived in Mary’s womb. Therefore, they must go against all consensus of understanding, saying that Christ is the beginning of God’s new creation, rather than seeing Jesus as referring here to the original creation. I here quote their explanation of this verse: “Christ is the beginning of this new creation of God (Rev 3:14), leading the way to which his followers can attain, for, what he is today they can become.” [1] While it is true that Christ is making all things new, whenever He speaks of the new creation, He refers to it as such (Rev 21:1,5; 2Cor 5:17; Gal 6:15). To read “I am the beginning of the creation of God” as “I am the beginning of the new creation of God,” is to add to the text something which is not actually stated.
 
However, if we let Scripture interpret Scripture, it becomes clear that, here in John’s Revelation, Jesus is referring to Himself as the uncreated originating source of all creation, the Almighty (Rev 1:8), the eternal Word (Rev 19:13), rather than saying that He is merely the first created being. We see in Scripture that before the ages (before time/space creation) the Father made the ages through the Son, and the Son upholds all things by the word of His power (Heb 1:1-3; Col 1:17). Also, in John 1:1-3 we see that in the beginning the Word already was, being Himself God, and that “all things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.”
 
Also, in Colossians 1:16 we see that all things were created in (ἔν) Him, whether visible or invisible. Only of the infinitely immense omnipresent Son of God could it be said that all things were created in Him. Only of the infinite God could Solomon say: “Behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You” (1 Kings 8:27).
 
Therefore, ἀρχή in this context cannot mean “the beginning” in the sense of the first created, since He existed prior to His creation and infinitely extends beyond its limits. Here ἀρχή expresses that He is the active beginning of the creation, the One who caused the creation. It speaks of His priority and preeminence over God’s creation, just as we see His creative role expressed in the other New Testament passages cited above. According to The Complete Word Study Diccionary, when ἀρχή is used as a metonymy of persons, as we see here, it expresses priority and preeminence. [2]
 
We saw in the previous blog that Jesus is the Almighty, the Yahweh Elohim of the Old Testament. For those who would argue that the Son was subsequently created as a God, Yahweh is very emphatic, saying to His people Israel:
 
“You are My witnesses, says Yahweh, and My servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I AM (LXX ἐγώ εἰμι). Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me.” (Isa 43:10)
 
While there are some men and angels who have been designated by Yahweh as gods, in these cases it is merely a delegated position of authority. Yahweh, the I AM, very emphatically declares that there has never been a God created before Him nor after Him. There is only one true God, and both the Father and the Son comprise that one true God (Jn 17:3, cf., 1Jn 5:20). God is one, but that oneness is a complex unity. As Jesus said: “I and My Father are one” (Jn 10:30). For that reason, He could truly say: “He who has seen Me has seen the Father” (Jn 14:9). They are distinct, yet one, rather than being two separate Gods.
 
Colossians 1:15-17 “He is… the firstborn over all creation”
 
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation (πρωτοτοκος πασης κτισεως). 16 FOR by (ἔν “in”) Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.” (Col 1:15-17)
 
The word “firstborn” is from the compound word πρωτοτοκος (prototokos), made up of protos, meaning “first” and tikto, “to produce.” It literally means “the first to be produced.” From it we derived our word “prototype.” It is commonly used in a literal sense to refer to the firstborn.
 
A. E. Knoch had a unique way of applying this term here. While he believed that the Son of God was first as to creation, he did not see that as having been a birth, which left him with a dilemma. He attempts to resolve it by dividing first from born. The following is his ingenious attempt to explain the meaning of πρωτοτοκος or firstborn:
 
“It does not necessarily imply that He was born first. There were many sons of God before His generation as a man. He is the first in reference to creation and the only begotten in regard to generation.” (emphasis mine) [3]
 
So, according to Knoch, “first” refers to His creation, and “born” refers to His conception in Mary’s womb, many centuries later. However, dividing the word “firstborn” in this manner is unique to him and is a stretch, to say the least!
 
While the term “firstborn” was often used in a literal sense, the firstborn son among the Jews obtained the birthright which gave them a position of privilege and legal authority over the other members of the household. Eventually, the word came to be used figuratively referring to a position of authority and pre-eminence, without regard to birth.
 
For example, God said of the coming Messiah, the Son of David: “Also I will make him My firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth” (Ps 89:27). Here we see the term “firstborn” used figuratively of Christ the Son of David receiving a position of preeminence as King of kings and Lord of lords. It is not used in a literal sense, referring to His birth, but rather to His exaltation during the Millennial kingdom. (Other instances in the New Testament where πρωτοτοκος is used in this sense without reference to a literal birth are Rom 8:29; Col 1:18; Heb 1:6, and possibly 12:23).
 
If there were any doubt concerning what is meant by Christ being the firstborn of all creation, the meaning is explained for us in verse 16 and following, introduced with the explanatory “for”:
 
“…the firstborn over all creation. FOR by (ἔν “in”) Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.” (Col 1:15b-17)
 
Clearly, in the light of these explanatory statements, the term “firstborn” in Colossians 1:15 is to be understood only in the sense of being prior to and pre-eminent over all things created, rather than the Son Himself having been created or born.
 
The Christadelphians recognize this usage of the term “firstborn” and appeal to it, since they believe that Christ did not even exist prior to His conception in Mary’s womb. Since they do not believe that the Son existed at the time of creation, they must argue that Colossians 1 is not referring to the original creation, but to the new creation, just as they do with Revelation 3:14. However, there are several problems with trying to make Colossians 1 refer to a new creation.
 
In the first place, it is described in the past tense, referring to a creation which had already occurred, whereas the new creation is presently in progress and will not be completed until the end of the times of the restoration of all, when all will have finally been made alive and subjected to Christ, resulting in God being all in all in eternity (Acts 3:21; 1Cor 15:22,28).

Also, in verse 17 we see that, not only were all things created in, through and for Him (past tense), but these same all things are presently being held together by Him (συνιστάω). Hebrews further elaborates, saying that He upholds all things by the word of His power” (Heb 1:3). This explains the scientific mystery of the immense power which holds all the atoms of the universe together.

Not only is the creation of all things spoken of here in past tense, but we also see that that same creation, consisting of all things in heaven and on earth had become estranged from God and at enmity with Him, needing to be reconciled:
 
“For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, 20 and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.” (Col 1:19-20)
 
Here we see that God sent His Son in order to reconcile by His own shed blood the very same all things which Christ is said to have originally created in verses 15-17 but had become alienated through the fall. In the final dispensation of the fullness of the times, all creation, both in heaven and on earth, will once again be reunited in Christ, becoming part of His new creation (Eph 1:10; 2Cor 5:17).
 
Clearly, the term “firstborn” in this passage figuratively expresses Christ’s pre-eminence over creation, rather than saying that He was somehow literally born at the beginning of creation. Colossians 1 presents the Son as the Creator, Sustainer and Reconciler of all created things, just as we see Him presented throughout the rest of the New Testament.
 
John 3:16 “His only begotten Son”
 
Both Christadelphians and the followers of Knoch understand “only begotten Son” to be referring to the physical birth of God’s Son through Mary at Bethlehem. However, this reflects an earlier misunderstanding of the etymology of the word μονογενής (monogenes), rendered “only begotten” in the Authorized Version.
 
At the time when the King James Version was translated, it was thought that μονογενής was composed of μόνος, “only” and γεννάω, “to beget or procreate.” However, as more extrabiblical Greek manuscripts were discovered and examined it became evident that μονογενής was made up of μόνος and γένος, which means “kind,” instead of γεννάω, “to beget.” Therefore, a more correct reading would be, “His only one-of-a-kind Son,” His only unique Son,” or simply “His only Son.”
 
Even the KJV correctly rendered μονογενής as “only” in nearly every instance, except when it was used referring to the Son of God (“only” Lu 7:12; 8:42; 9:38, cf. “only begotten” Jn 1:14,18; 3:16,18; 1Jn 4:9; Heb 11:17). The only time they rendered μονογενής as “only begotten” referring to someone other than Jesus, was in Hebrews 11:17 where it is clearly a mistranslation, since it calls Isaac Abraham’s only begotten son, when in reality Isaac wasn’t his “only begotten son,” since he also had Ishmael. The obvious reading here should be “your only unique son,” i.e., your only son according to the promise. Most modern translations correct this error, consistently rendering μονογενής as “only” or “unique.”
 
Obviously, if the Word who became flesh in the incarnation was in the beginning with God, being Himself God, having neither beginning of days nor end of life (Jn 1:1,14; Heb 7:3), He did not literally come into existence by being begotten as God’s Son in Bethlehem, but has always existed as the only unique Son of God. Within the Godhead, the titles Father and Son do not speak of generation by reproduction but of the economic relationship enjoyed between them.
 
Hebrews 1:5 “You are my Son, Today have I begotten You”
 
This verse is here quoted from Psalm 2:7, referring to Christ, and it is mistakenly presented as evidence that He wasn’t the Son of God prior to His birth in Bethlehem. However, Luke, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, indicated that the Father had declared this concerning Christ at the time of His resurrection, figuratively being the firstborn from the dead (Col 1:18). Luke says:
 
“God has fulfilled this for us their children, in that He has raised up Jesus. As it is also written in the second Psalm: ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You.’” (Acts 13:33)
 
Psalm 2:7 cannot be referring to Christ’s resurrection and at the same time refer to His birth. Equally mistaken are those who believe that Psalm 2:7 speaks of some sort of “eternal generation” of the Son of God by God’s eternal decree.
 
Genesis 3:15 “the seed of the woman.”
 
The final argument I will be considering in this blog is presented by the Christadelphians against Christ ever having existed prior to His conception in Mary’s womb. It shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the biblical teaching concerning the incarnation of the Son of God. The argument goes: “If Christ pre-existed, how could he be described as ‘the seed of the woman?’”  [4]
 
This ignores the fact that the eternal Word, being God the Son, became flesh, being born of a woman, and dwelt among us (Jn 1:14; Gal 4:4). He didn’t begin to exist nine months prior to being born in Bethlehem – He already existed previous to becoming incarnate. It was said of the preincarnate Son that He was sent and that He came into the world. A non-existent being could not be said to have been sent or to have come:
 
“But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law.” (Gal 4:4)
 
“Therefore, coming into the world (present participle), He said: ‘Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but a body You have prepared for Me.  6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You had no pleasure. 7 Then I said, 'Behold, I have come — in the volume of the book it is written of Me —  to do Your will, O God.’” (Heb 10:5-7)
 
It doesn’t say that God “conceived” a Son, but that He “sent” Him. The fact that He is here seen to have been conversing with the Father prior to His incarnation when He was being sent by Him, and that He willingly came into the world to do the Father’s will, requires that He had a conscious existence prior to being born of a woman. In Matthew 20:28, Jesus said that He came with a purpose – to serve and to give His life a ransom for many. This logically requires a previous conscious existence.
 
In Philippians 2 we see that, prior to coming in the likeness of men, He existed in the form of God. But rather than clinging to His position of equality with God, He emptied Himself, taking upon Himself all the limitations of humanity:
 
“Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.” (Phil 2:5-8)
 
Here we see Him first presented as existing in the form of God. Then He emptied Himself in taking on the form of a servant in the likeness of men, appearing as a man. He came to serve and give His life a ransom for mankind. In order to do that, it was necessary that He become incarnate in human form as our Kinsman Redeemer. The language of this passage becomes meaningless if indeed He didn’t exist as God prior to taking on human flesh.
 
Therefore, in answer to their question: “If Christ pre-existed, how could he be described as ‘the seed of the woman?’” I would ask: “How else could Yahweh become our Savior and Kinsman redeemer?” In order for the Son of God to be our Savior, He had to be fully God and at the same time fully man. He was fully divine as the Son of God and at the same time fully human as the seed of the woman, born of the seed of David according to the flesh (Rom 1:3-4). While existing in the form of God, the Father sent His only unique Son to be born of a woman according to the flesh. However, He never ceased being God: He simply took upon Himself the likeness of sinful flesh, yet without sin:
 
“For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh.” (Rom 8:3)
 
God the Son had to become incarnate on account of sin – not His own sin, but rather on account of the sins of the world of humanity. The child Jesus who was born in a manger may have appeared to be just as any other newborn. However, Isaiah the prophet was shown that He was in reality Emanuel or “God with us” (Isa 7:14; Matt 1:23). Isaiah also declared of Him:
 
“For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” (Isa 9:6)
 
Conclusion
 
Having examined five of the primary texts used to deny that the Son of God is co-eternal with the Father, it becomes clear that, when properly understood, they in no way contradict the overall revelation of Scripture concerning the eternal preexistence of the Son.
 
Nevertheless, Christadelphians actually teach that, in order for one to have eternal life, they must deny that Christ, the Son of God, is co-equal and co-eternal with the Father, since, to them, only the Father is the true God. In the next blog I will be considering the passages of Scripture they use to support this claim.


[1] christadelphia.org “Jesus Did Not Pre-Exist”
 

[2] The Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament,  ἀρχή, NT:746:
(VII) Spoken by metonymy of persons indicating not time but priority and preeminence (Col 1:18, "who is the beginning," meaning the ruler). See prœtótokos
 (4416), firstborn; Sept.: Gen 49:3; Deut 21:17. In Rev 1:8; 21:6; 22:13, "the beginning and the end" means the first and the last indicating the One who created the beginning and the One who will bring about the end of what He originally created, not through elimination but change. In Rev 3:14, "the beginning of the creation" means the active beginning of the creation, the One who caused the creation, referring to Jesus Christ not as a created being, but the One who created all things (John 1:3).
The Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament © 1992 by AMG International, Inc. Revised Edition, 1993)
 

[3] A. E. Knoch, Sons of God
 

[4] christadelphia.org “Jesus Did Not Pre-Exist”


Published on
Image description
by George Sidney Hurd

Is the Son of God eternal, as the Church has believed from its earliest days, or was there a time when He did not exist?  [1]That is the question that I hope to answer from Scripture in this blog. There are some modern-day versions of third century Arianism, like the Jehovah Witnesses and the followers of A. E. Knoch, who argue that the Son is not eternal, but rather was the first being created by the Father. Others, like the Christadelphians, believe that the Son of God didn’t even exist prior to being conceived in Mary’s womb, being merely a man whom God enabled to overcome His own fallen sinful flesh, thereby showing us the way of salvation. After examining the Scriptural evidence for the eternal existence of the Son, I will be considering some of the proof-texts these groups make use of in order to deny Christ’s eternal preexistence.
 
Does it really matter?
 
Some believe that the Deity of Christ and His eternal preexistence is peripheral to the Christian faith and not an issue that we should divide over. However, according to Scripture, no one other than Yahweh Elohim Himself could have ever been our Savior. Yahweh repeatedly declared there can be no savior besides Him. He said:
 
“I, even I, am the Lord (Yahweh), and besides Me there is no savior.” (Isa 43:11)
 
“Yet I am the Lord your God ever since the land of Egypt, and you shall know no God but Me; for there is no savior besides Me.” (Hos 13:4)
 
“And there is no other God besides Me, a just God and a Saviorthere is none besides Me.” (Isa 45:21)
 
Being a just God, there could not have been another savior besides Himself. If God were to have sent one of His created beings to suffer the just penalty for our sins against Him, rather than bearing that penalty Himself, that would have only served to compound injustice. A. E. Knoch and his followers even present God as being the original source of evil. Try to imagine a God who first creates evil, and then sends one of His creatures to suffer in order to satisfy His own offended justice, which was in reality the result of the very evil He Himself created!
 
The psalmist understood that no mere creature could redeem another’s soul from Sheol: Our Redeemer had to be God Himself. He said:
 
No man can by any means redeem his brother or give to God a ransom for himFor the redemption of his soul is costly, and he should cease trying forever — 15
But God will redeem my soul from the power of Sheol, for He will receive me.” (Ps 49:7-8,15 NASU)
 
We see that our ransom price is owed to God, but no man is able to pay it. Only God Himself could have paid it. If the one who died for us upon the cross had been merely an angel or a man divinely enabled to undergo such suffering instead of the Son being God Himself incarnate, His suffering and death would not have had sufficient value to make propitiation for the sins of the whole world.
 
Some, failing to understand the Triune nature of God, have ridiculed those who believe in Christ’s Penal Substitutionary Atonement, saying that one man suffering for six hours on the cross wouldn’t have had sufficient value to atone for all the sins committed throughout history. What they fail to take into account is that it was God in flesh who bore our sins on that tree, and therefore His sacrifice of Himself had infinite value.
 
Had He been a mere man, His blood would not have atoned for the sins of even one soul, let alone the sins of the whole world. That is why there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved, except for the name of Jesus, which means “Yahweh saves” (Acts 4:12). That is why Jesus said to those who refused to believe that He was who He said He was: “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I AM (ego eimí), you will die in your sins” (John 8:24).
 
Jesus is the Eternal I AM
 
“I AM” is the name by which Yahweh identified Himself at the burning bush when Moses asked Him by which name He should be called (Ex 3:14). From this point forward, we see Yahweh referring to Himself numerous times as the I AM (Deut 32:39; Isa 41:4; 43:10; 43:13; 46:4; 48:12; 52:6). It is significant that Jesus is the only one who identifies Himself as the I AM in the New Testament.
 
The verb “to be” normally requires a predicate in order to make a complete phrase, whether it be in Greek or in English. Each time Jesus refers to Himself as I AM, He is affirming His Deity as the eternal Yahweh (Jn 8:56-59; 13:19; 6:19-20; 4:26; 18:3-8). I demonstrate this in more detail in my blog, Jesus Christ the Eternal I AM. Here I just want to point out a couple of these instances in which Christ most emphatically identifies Himself as Yahweh, the eternal I AM.
 
Revelation 1:17
 
In Isaiah alone, Yahweh uses the title I AM, referring to Himself as the eternal self-existent One 6 times. One of these is especially significant, since Jesus later identifies Himself as being that same Yahweh. Yahweh says:
 
“I, the Lord (Yahweh), am the First; and the Last; I AM (LXX ἐγὼ θεὸς πρῶτος, καὶ εἰς τὰ ἐπερχόμενα ἐγώ εἰμι.).” (Isa 41:4)
 
This is one of the most emphatic declarations of Yahweh’s eternality. When the glorified Christ appeared to John the Revelator, He identified Himself in the same manner saying:
 
“Do not be afraid; I AM (ἐγώ εἰμι, ego eimí) the First and the Last.” (Rev 1:17, cf. Rev 22:13)
 
Here Jesus identifies Himself as being the Yahweh of the Old Testament, the First and the Last. While it is possible for the one Triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, to coequally be the First and the Last as one, it is not possible that the Christ also be the First and the Last if indeed He had been subsequently created by Yahweh who alone is said to be the First and the Last.
 
Not only this, but Jesus also declares Himself to be the Almighty (Rev 1:8). While a created being may be called mighty, there can only be one Almighty, yet Yahweh who appeared to the Patriarchs also repeatedly called Himself the Almighty. Clearly, the Son of God has always been the visible manifestation of the one and only Triune Almighty God. There cannot be two separate Almighties.
 
Those who deny the Deity of Christ often say that He wasn’t God but merely His representative. They appeal to the Hebrew practice of appointing a legal representative or emissary (Heb. shaliah) who was basically a legal agent appointed to make transactions in representation of another person. However, in reality, this is nothing unique to the Hebrews, since every society utilizes legal representatives with authority to make transactions in the place of another or go in representation of another. However, a shaliah only represented those who sent them, they never impersonated them. A shaliah would speak and act in representation of the Almighty, but they would never say “I am the Almighty.” That would have been blasphemy, even for a shaliah. A shaliah never impersonated the one whom they represented.
 
John 8:58
 
“Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.’ 57 Then the Jews said to Him, ‘You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?’ 58 Jesus said to them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM (ego eimí).’ 59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.” (Jn 8:56-59)
 
The obvious reason why the Jews picked up stones to throw at Jesus was because of His declaration, “before Abraham came to be, I AM.” They understood Him to be declaring His eternal preexistence as the I AM and sought to stone Him for blasphemy. If indeed Jesus were merely the representative of the eternal I AM, surely He would have explained it to them in order to avoid being mistaken as claiming to be God Himself, but He didn’t. Even if He had said I WAS before Abraham,” they wouldn’t have sought to stone Him. They understood that He was claiming to be Yahweh, the eternal I AM. Knowing the Scriptures, they knew that He was claiming to be the one and only Yahweh I AM, as emphatically declared in Isaiah:
 
“You are My witnesses,’ says the LORD (Yahweh), ‘And My servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I AM (LXX ἐγώ εἰμι, ego eimí). Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me.” (Isa 43:10)
 
There is no reasonable way in which John 8:58 can be reconciled with the belief that the Son of God who calls Himself the I AM is not eternal but merely a god who was formed or created by Yahweh – not to mention the claim of the Christadelphians that the Son didn’t even exist at all prior to being conceived in Mary’s womb.
 
Jesus is the Yahweh Elohim of the Old Testament
 
Many have overlooked the fact that Christ, as well as the New Testament authors, often quoted passages from the Old Testament referring to Yahweh Elohim, applying them to Christ, the Son of God. In my blog, Jesus is the Yahweh of the Old Testament, I cite fourteen texts which clearly identify Christ as the Yahweh of the Old Testament. Here I will just cite a couple of them for brevity.
 
1) Only Yahweh / Jesus is the Creator of All
 
Yahweh Elohim is not only presented as the only Savior, but He is also presented in the Old Testament as the only Creator of heaven and earth. Isaiah says:
 
“For thus says Yahweh, who created the heavens, who is God (Elohim), who formed the earth and made it, who has established it, who did not create it in vain, who formed it to be inhabited: ‘I am Yahweh, and there is no other.’” (Isa 45:18)
 
In Psalm 102 the psalmist worships Yahweh Elohim as the eternal Creator who never changes. He says of Him:
 
“Of old You laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands. 26 They will perish, but You will endure; Yes, they will all grow old like a garment; Like a cloak You will change them, and they will be changed. 27 But You are the same, and Your years will have no end.” (Ps 102:25-27)
 
The writer of Hebrews directly acknowledges Jesus as Yahweh when he quotes directly from this Psalm preceded by Psalm 45:6, which is also quoted word for word, identifying Jesus as Yahweh Elohim:
 
“But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God (Elohim), is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom… 10 And: “You, Lord (Yahweh), in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands. 11 They will perish, but You remain; and they will all grow old like a garment; 12 Like a cloak You will fold them up, and they will be changed. But You are the same, and Your years will not fail.’” (Heb 1:8,10-12, cf. Psa 45:6-7)
 
Here we see that Hebrews 1:10-12 is a direct quote from Psalm 102:25-27, identifying Jesus as the Yahweh who created all things. If that affirmation of His deity were not clear enough to silence those who claimed that He was a mere angel, he continues by saying in the next verse: “But to which of the angels has He ever said: ‘Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool?’” (Heb 1:13)
 
This passage in Hebrews clearly affirms that Jesus is the eternal Yahweh Elohim, who is the same yesterday, today and forever (Heb 13:8), and the Creator of all things. As John says:
 
“He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him” (Jn 1:10).
 
When the writer of Hebrews says that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever, it is a declaration of His eternal existence, just as His identification of Himself as the I AM, or the First and the Last. In Hebrews 7:3 he says that Melchizedek was a type of Christ in that he had, neither beginning of days nor end of life.” Christ’s eternal preexistence couldn’t have been expressed any clearer!
 
2) Isaiah saw Yahweh / Jesus’ glory
 
At the time Yahweh anointed Isaiah as a prophet, Isaiah saw Him on His throne in a heavenly vision. He describes it in Isaiah chapter six:
 
“In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw Yahweh sitting on a throne, high and lifted up, and the train of His robe filled the temple. 2 Above it stood seraphim; each one had six wings: with two he covered his face, with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. 3 And one cried to another and said: ‘Holy, holy, holy is Yahweh of hosts; The whole earth is full of His glory!’… 5 So I said: ‘Woe is me, for I am undone! Because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; For my eyes have seen the King, Yahweh of hosts… 9 And He said, "Go, and tell this people: ‘Keep on hearing, but do not understand; Keep on seeing, but do not perceive.' 10 "Make the heart of this people dull, and their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and return and be healed.”  (Isa 6:1-5,9,10)
 
Jesus manifested His glory, performing signs and wonders, and the people still did not believe Him. John quotes Isaiah 6 to explain the reason why they did not believe even though Jesus had manifested His glory in their presence. In doing so, he clearly identified Him as Yahweh. He said:
 
“But although He had done so many signs before them, they did not believe in Him, 38 that the word of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spoke: ‘Lord (Yahweh), who has believed our report? And to whom has the arm of the Lord (Yahweh) been revealed?’  39 Therefore they could not believe, because Isaiah said again: 40 ‘He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, lest they should see with their eyes, lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, so that I should heal them.’ 41 These things Isaiah said when he saw HIS glory and spoke of HIM.” (John 12:37-41)
 
John, consistent with the entire gospel of John, affirms the full divinity of Christ, presenting Him as being the same Yahweh who appeared to Isaiah. The New Testament authors consistently identified Jesus as being Yahweh.
 
There are many more Scriptures which present Christ the Son of God as eternally preexisting. John 1 says that the Word who became flesh was with God in the beginning and He was God. John 1:3 continues saying: “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.” That in itself refutes the claim that He had a beginning, having been created.
 
We see in Philippians 2 that Christ existed in the form of God prior to His incarnation. He always was the visible form or expression of the invisible God. In the incarnation He humbled Himself, coming as a servant in the likeness of men. No one has seen God the Father. Every appearance of Yahweh Elohim in the Old Testament was the preincarnate Christ. He has always been the only visible manifestation of the invisible God. I demonstrate this in my blog: The Christophanies of the Old Testament.
 
In Jesus’ intercessory prayer in John 17, on the night of His passion, before being crucified, He prayed to the Father saying:
 
“I have glorified You on the earth. I have finished the work which You have given Me to do.  5 And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.” (John 17:4-5)
 
Obviously, in order for Christ to have shared in the Father’s glory before creation He had to have existed prior to creation. One may be chosen from the foundation of the world without having yet known or experienced it, but it is impossible to have had the Father’s glory with Him without ever having known or experienced it.
 
Conclusion
 
Having seen that no one other than Yahweh Himself could have been our Savior, and that Jesus is identified in the New Testament as the Yahweh I AM, the First and the Last, the Almighty, without beginning of days, nor end of life, the Creator and sustainer of all things which exist, we now have a foundation upon which to base our understanding of the Son of God. Those who deny Christ’s eternal preexistence must ignore or try to explain away the obvious meaning of these clear affirmations of the eternal existence of the Son.
 
In the next blog I will be considering the texts commonly presented to argue against the eternality of the Son of God. Most who use these proof-texts fail to take into account the economic relationship that exists within the Godhead. While we can see in Scripture that they are co-equal in essence and attributes, nevertheless, as expressed by the titles Father and Son, they are not the same in authority, but rather enjoy a loving complementary relationship. The Son is subject to the Father and the Holy Spirit likewise carries out the will of the Father and glorifies the Son. When Jesus said, “the Father is greater than I,” it must not be misconstrued as meaning that the Son is somehow inferior in essence to the Father, any more than my son is inferior to me. Rather, the Father is greater in authority than the Son.
 
Another thing those who deny Christ’s preexistence fail to take into account (especially the Christadelphians), is that, while Christ was one hundred percent God, He was also one hundred percent man. While He continued being the Son of God, He also became the Son of Man. When He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, coming in the likeness of men, He submitted Himself to the limitations of a fleshly body.  Even though, as the Son of God, He continued being the One who sustains all things by the word of His power (Heb 1:3; Col 1:17), in His humanity He had to grow in wisdom and stature (Lu 2:39). While as God He knew all things, in His humanity He had to grow in knowledge. He suffered fatigue as any other man, and as a man in the likeness of sinful flesh He was tempted in all points as we, yet without sin (Rom 8:3; Heb 4:15). This union of the Divine and human nature of the Son is referred to as the hypostatic union. All these considerations are fundamental to a proper understanding of the Son of God, as we shall see in the next blog.
 
 


[1] The Ante-Nicene Fathers and the Trinity
Published on
Image description
by George Sidney Hurd
 --
The claim is often made by anti-Trinitarians that the doctrine of the Trinity was not held by the Church Fathers prior to the 4th century, at which time it was formulated and made part of Church dogma by the Council of Nicaea which convened in 325 A D.
 
However, as I hope to demonstrate in this blog, the Church Fathers understood the Godhead as being Triune from the very beginning. It is true that the language they used to express the Trinity was at first limited to general nonspecific affirmations. However, as their beliefs began to come under attack, first by the Gnostics and Modalists, and then later in the 3rd century by the Arians who denied the full deity of Christ and the person of the Holy Spirit, their language of necessity became more precise and specific. The following citations of the Fathers are just a few of hundreds which make it abundantly clear that the Church Fathers believed in the Trinity from the time of the Apostles.
 
 
Ignatius (30 – 107AD)
 
“Since, also, there is but one unbegotten Being, God, even the Father; and one only-begotten Son, God, the Word and man; and one Comforter, the Spirit of truth.” [1]



While this statement is simply a general affirmation, emphasizing that there are only three who are God in opposition to the Gnostics who believed that we are all gods, he does nevertheless clearly mention three distinct persons who are God. At the same time, he emphasizes throughout his epistle that there is only one God, so he is clearly not teaching Tritheism.
 
Justin Martyr (100 – 165AD)  
 
“Therefore neither Abraham, nor Isaac, nor Jacob, nor any other man, saw the Father and ineffable Lord of all, and also of Christ, but saw Him who was according to His will His Son, being God, and the Angel because He ministered to His will; whom also it pleased Him to be born man by the Virgin; who also was fire when He conversed with Moses from the bush. Since, unless we thus comprehend the Scriptures, it must follow that the Father and Lord of all had not been in heaven when what Moses wrote took place: ‘And the Lord rained upon Sodom fire and brimstone from the Lord out of heaven’… and again, when He says: ‘The Lord says to my Lord, Sit at My right hand, till I make Thine enemies Thy footstool.’” [2]
 
In the context of this quote, Justin Martyr is establishing that Yahweh who was seen in the Theophanies of the  Old Testament was not the Father but God the Son; that the Angel of the Lord in the Old Testament was in fact the preincarnate Son of God; that when it says in Genesis 19:24 that Yahweh rained fire upon Sodom from Yahweh, it is referring to the preincarnate Son who was with Abraham, and the Father in heaven, just as in Psalms 110:1 says: Yahweh says to my Adonai, sit at My right hand till I make Your enemies your footstool.”  I demonstrate that Jesus is the Yahweh of the Old Testament in my blog, Jesus is the Yahweh of the Old Testament, and also the Angel of Yahweh in my blog, The Christophanies of the Old Testament.
 
“For, in the name (sing.) of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they then receive the washing with water.” [3]
 
Speaking of water baptism, Justin Martyr alludes to the Triune baptismal formula given by Jesus in Matthew 28:19, “baptizing them in the name (sing.) of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”  While they are three persons, they are nevertheless one in name since they are one God and not three Gods.
 
Ignatius of Antioch (died 110AD).  
 
“There is one Physician who is possessed both of flesh and spirit; both made and not made (begotten and unbegotten), God existing in flesh; true life in death; both of Mary and of God; first possible and then impossible,-  even Jesus Christ our Lord…” [4]
 
Here Ignatius speaks of the Son of God as both begotten of Mary and unbegotten as the eternal Son of God (begotten and unbegotten, gennhtos kai agennhtos), God existing in flesh. This is a clear affirmation of the eternal deity of Christ. While it is another subject in itself, begotten is from γεννάω (gennao) and should not be confused with γένος (genos) which means “kind.” Jesus is referred to as the Father’s “only Son” or “unique one of a kind Son” (μονογενής, monogenes), rather than His “only begotten Son.” [5] Most modern translations reflect this correction.
 
Irenaeus (115-190AD).  
 
“The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: . . . one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father ‘to gather all in one,’ and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, ‘every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess; to him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all . . . ‘” [6]
 
In addition to Irenaeus’ obvious references to the final restoration of all, he says that the Church had received from the Apostles and the disciples of the Apostles the belief in one God the Father, one Jesus Christ and in the Holy Spirit, three distinct persons. Additionally, he says that Christ Jesus is Lord and God. This quote contains an allusion to 1 Corinthians 8:6, which says: “yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live.”
 
Some Unitarians have mistaken Paul as saying here that only the Father is God. However, both Jesus and the Holy Spirit are also called God in Scripture, therefore they also make up the one Godhead. It also says that there is one Lord, yet we know that the Father and the Holy Spirit are also called Lord in Scripture. Paul was addressing Gentiles of Corinth who had been raised in a polytheistic society, and we see in the context that his objective was to emphasize that for us there is only one God and one Lord, not many.
 
Athenagoras, (133 – 190AD)
 
“Who, then, would not be astonished to hear men who speak of God the Father, and of God the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and who declare both their power in union and their distinction in order, called atheists?” [7]
 
“…they know God and His Logos, what is the oneness of the Son with the Father, what the communion of the Father with the Son, what is the Spirit, what is the unity of these three, the Spirit, the Son, the Father, and their distinction in unity.” [8]
 
Here we see in the 2nd century a clear expression of the triunity of the Godhead or the Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. As iron sharpens iron, the Fathers became more specific and precise in their use of terms as the Scriptural doctrine of God came under attack from different fronts. At this time the distinction of persons within the Godhead was emphasized in response to the Modalists who denied that the one God exists as three persons, saying that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are merely three forms in which the one God manifests Himself. A modern version of Modalism is the Oneness Pentecostals, or Jesus Only Pentecostals.
 
The Christians at that time were called Atheists because they did not worship the pagan gods; nor would they acknowledge the emperor as being a god.
 
Tertullian (155 – 220AD)  
 
“Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Personswho are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are one essence, not one Person, as it is said, I and my Father are One, in respect of unity of substance not singularity of number. For just as the Word of God is not actually He whose Word He is, so also the Spirit (although He is called God) is not actually He whose Spirit He is said to be. Nothing which belongs to something else is actually the very same thing as that to which it belongs. He commands them to baptize into the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, not into a unipersonal God.” [9]

In Tertullian’s treatise, Against Praxeas, he is not opposing Arianism, or the denial of the deity of Christ and the person of the Holy Spirit since that was a non-issue at the time, being that Arius wasn’t even born until after Tertullian’s death. Tertullian was opposing the Modalism of Praxeas, who like Sabellius, taught that God was a unipersonal being, with Father, Son, and Holy Spirit simply being three modes or manifestations of that one divine Person. In his treatise, Tertullian uses the word “Trinity” 15 times and emphasizes the Triune nature of God.
 
He seeks to demonstrate by various examples the logical absurdities one confronts when reading the Scripture as though God were a solitary being rather than Father, Son and Holy Spirit. He says to Praxeas:
 
“If you want me to believe him to be both the Father and the Son, show me some other passage where it is declared, “The Lord said to himself, ‘I am my own Son, today have I begotten myself.’ … On your side, however, you must make Him out to be a liar, an impostor, and a tamperer with his word, if, when he was himself a Son to himself, he assigned the part of his Son to be played by another. All the Scriptures attest the clear existence of, and distinction of persons in the Trinity, and indeed furnish us with our Rule of faith. He who speaks, and he of whom he speaks and to whom he speaks, cannot possibly seem to be one and the same.” [10]
 
He also answers to the claim that Trinitarians are Tritheists, saying:
 
“Bear always in mind that this is the rule of faith which I profess; by it I testify that the Father, and the Son, and the Spirit are inseparable from each other, and so will you know in what sense this is said. Now, observe, my assertion is that the Father is one, and the Son one, and the Spirit one, and that They are distinct from Each Other. This statement is taken in a wrong sense by every uneducated as well as every perversely disposed person, as if it predicated a diversity, in such a sense as to imply a separation among the Father, and the Son, and the Spirit.” [11]
 
In spite of the fact that we as Trinitarians emphatically affirm that we are Monotheists who believe that the one true God is Triune as to Persons, to this day, we continue to be misrepresented as though we were Tritheists, teaching that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three separate Gods.
 
Origen (185 – 254AD).  
 
“But in our desire to show the divine benefits bestowed upon us by Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which Trinity is the fountain of all holiness, we have fallen, in what we have said, into a digression, having considered that the subject of the soul… We shall, however, with the permission of God through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, more conveniently consider in the proper place the subject of all rational beings, which are distinguished into three genera and species.”  [12]
 
In his treatise, de Principiis alone, Origen uses the word “Trinity” to refer to the Godhead over 20 times. Origen emphasized that the Holy Spirit is a person of the Triune Godhead and not merely the impersonal force or influence of God. He said:
 
“…the person of the Holy Spirit was of such authority and dignity, that saving baptism was not complete except by the authority of the most excellent Trinity of them all, i.e., by the naming of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” [13]
 
In response to those who claimed that the Son of God was a created being, Origen said:
 
How, then, can it be asserted that there once was a time when He was not the Son? For that is nothing else than to say that there was once a time when He was not the Truth, nor the Wisdom, nor the Life, although in all these He is judged to be the perfect essence of God the Father; for these things cannot be severed from Him, or even be separated from His essence. And although these qualities are said to be many in understanding, yet in their nature and essence they are one, and in them is the fulness of divinity. Now this expression which we employ- ‘that there never was a time when He did not exist’ - is to be understood with an allowance. For these very words ‘when’ or ‘never’ have a meaning that relates to time, whereas the statements made regarding Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are to be understood as transcending all time, all ages, and all eternity. For it is the Trinity alone which exceeds the comprehension not only of temporal but even of eternal intelligence; while other things which are not included in it are to be measured by times and ages.” [14]
 
Hippolytus of Rome, (170 – 235AD)
 
“Who will not say that there is one God? Yet, he will not on that account deny the economy.”
“If then the Word was with God and was also God, what follows? Would one say that I speak of two Gods? I will not indeed speak of two Gods, but of one. I speak of two persons, however, and of a third economy – the grace of the Holy Spirit…the economy of harmony is led back to one God. For God is one. The Father who commands, the Son who obeys and the Spirit who gives understanding.” [15]
 
The Greek Fathers used the word οἰκονομία “economy or dispensation” to describe the eternal economic complementary relationship between the persons of the Trinity. While they are one as to their essential nature and attributes, and co-eternal and co-equal, their relationship one with the other is distinct. In that sense, Jesus could say that the Father was greater than He, even though they are both the one and only Almighty God (Rev 1:8, cf. 11:17). The Son is eternally in loving submission to the Father and the Holy Spirit always carries out the will of the Father and the Son.
 
Cyprian of Carthage (210 – 258AD)
 
“And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit it is written: ‘And the three are One.’” [16]
 
Here we see Cyprian quoting what is commonly referred to as the Comma of 1John 5:7 which says: “For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.” While I am not a King James only advocate, I do feel that there are several good arguments for considering the Comma to have been part of the original text. Cyprian here cites it a hundred years before the oldest Greek manuscript we have of 1John, and he quotes it as though it were a commonly known passage in the Church at that time.
 
The authenticity of 1John 5:7 wasn’t severely challenged until the 19th century. It is true that there are very few later Greek manuscripts which contain the Comma, apart from the many Latin manuscripts which contain it. However, there is reason to believe that it was removed from the Greek texts of the Eastern Orthodox Church under pressure from the Arians, only being retained in the Latin texts by the Latin Church. The Eastern Orthodox Church was battling against Modalistic Sabellianism at the time, and the Comma, being one of the favorite prooftexts of the Sabellians, may have made them more willing to part with it.
 
It is significant that there is no record of anyone insisting that the Comma be included in Scripture before the council of Nicaea. We only have record of the Arians demanding that Gregory remove it, which implies that it was originally there and removed. For anyone who might want to investigate this subject further, Dr. C. H. Pappas, ThM, presents his arguments for its inclusion in his book In Defense of the Authenticity of 1 John 5:7.  
 
Alexander, Bishop of Alexandria (273 – 326AD)
 
“Therefore, when the holy prophets, and all, as I have said, who righteously and justly walked in the law of the Lord, together with the entire people, celebrated a typical and shadowy Passover, the Creator and Lord of every visible and invisible creature, the only-begotten Son, and the Word co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, and of the same substance with them, according to His divine nature, our Lord and God, Jesus Christ.” [17]
 
Here again, we see another Ante Nicene Father stating that the Son is co eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, sharing in the same essence or substance.
 
Conclusion
 
All of these quotes are from prominent Church Fathers long before the council of Nicea in 325AD. It is true that, as errors crept into the Church, it became necessary for Church leaders to convene to counter them with formal Church creeds. However, as we have seen, the Trinity was the prevailing doctrine of the Church from the very time of the Apostles.
 
 


[1] The Epistle of Ignatius to the Philadelphians Chapter IV



[2] Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, chapter 127
 

[3] Justin Martyr First Apology, chapter 61
 

[4] Ignatius, commentary on Ephesians, chapter 7
 

[5] https://mindrenewers.com/2014/12/16/the-meaning-of-only-begotten/
 

[6] Against Heresies, Book 10, chapter 1
 

[7] Athenagoras. The Sacred Writings of Athenagoras (p. 10). Jazzybee Verlag. Kindle Edition.
 

[8] Athenagoras. The Sacred Writings of Athenagoras (pp. 11-12). Jazzybee Verlag. Kindle Edition.
 

[9] Tertullian, Against Praxeas, chapter 25
 

[10] Tertullian, Against Praxeas, chapter 11
 

[11] Tertullian, Against Praxeas chapter 9
 

[12] Origen, De Princiipiis, book 1, chapter 4.2
 

[13] Origen, De Princiipiis, book 1, chapter 3.2
 

[14] Origen, De Princiipiis, book 4, chapter 28
 

[15] https://www.amazon.com/Apostolic-Tradition-Hippolytus-Popular-Patristic-ebook/dp/B084DXNNYW
 

[16] St. Cyprian, De Lapsis, The Unity of the Catholic Church, chapter 6
 

[17] Epistles on the Arian Heresy and the Deposition of Arius. Chapter 1.7
 

Categories

______________
The Inerrency of Scripture
The Love of God
The Fear of the Lord
The Question of Evil
Original Sin
Understanding the Atonement
Homosexuality and the Bible
Reincarnationism
Open Theism

Answers to Objections:

Has God Rejected Israel:
God's Glorious Plan for the Ages
The Manifest Sons of God
The Trinity and the Deity of Christ
Eternal Preexistence of Christ
Preterism vs. Futurism
The Two-Gospel Doctrine Examined
Tagalog Articles